Funding for university research nationwide is dwindling, but some researchers say it could work in their favor.
The federal budget, approved by U.S. Congress earlier this month, cuts funding for National Institutes of Health — which provides grants to university researchers — by about 1 percent or about $260 million for the 2011 fiscal year.
Despite the loss in funding, some researchers say the cut, paired with more flexibility, might improve research quality.
“There’s not an obvious correlation between the quality of science being done and the amount of money being spent on it,” said Paul Davies, researcher and theoretical physicist at Arizona State University. “If you’re spending a lot of money there’s a bit of a disincentive to think clearly about the problem.”
Davies said researchers do their best work if they are forced to think clearly about what they want to do and how they want to do it.
“It would be better to have more flexible money even if there’s less of it,” he said.
But not all researchers agree with Davies.
Barbara Entwisle, vice chancellor for research at UNC-CH, said she is concerned about the cuts.
“There’s a lot of high-quality research that’s not being funded as things stand now, so it’s hard to see a benefit for providing even less funding,” she said. “In some cases that I know of, only the top 10 percent of the people applying for funding are being funded.”