In order for UNC to claim academic prestige, all of the University’s programs must reflect prestige.
New details about academic fraud in the Department of African and Afro-American Studies at UNC seem to confirm what many have suggested all along, that academics are often compromised to maintain a competitive advantage in athletics.
The University’s investigation into the department began in September, when it was found that a former UNC defensive end plagiarized a paper for a course in the department, and the plagiarism went undetected.
In May, the University released a report on its findings which showed — among other things — forged faculty signatures on grade rolls for several courses and unauthorized grade changes.
At that time, University officials said the investigation was thorough and complete, and those involved in questionable academic practices will no longer be associated with UNC.
When the University’s initial report was released, Karen Gil, dean of the College of Arts and Sciences, sent a letter to all college faculty members: “The courses in question involved both athletes and non-athletes, and there was no evidence that athletes were treated differently than the other students.”
A month later, despite the fact that administrators claimed their confidence in the report’s completeness, Chancellor Holden Thorp said at least one of the suspect classes was composed solely of current and former football players.
This week, new reports in The (Raleigh) News & Observer suggest the problems involving student athletes were more ingrained and go back farther than the University initially suggested or reported.
The continued release of new information suggests that the University’s attempts at transparency have been neither thorough nor complete.