But few students are availing themselves of the right to use an attorney in these cases.
In the 2014-15 school year, less than 1 percent of original hearings in Honor Court included the use of an attorney in the actual hearing.
So far for this school year, there have been none.
Dean of Students Jonathan Sauls said students may choose to not use a lawyer in Honor Court proceedings because it is not a replica of the criminal justice process, and lawyers may not be aware of the University’s legal process.
“Not very many opt to (be represented by an attorney) ... but it is absolutely their right,” he said. “Students are advised of that opportunity.”
Sauls said this right is in the materials that are shared with students when they are informed of their basic rights.
Joe Cohn, legislative and policy director of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, said students may not exercise their right to an attorney because they may not know the right exists, or it could be because the hearings happen so quickly after the charges are brought that students can’t hire one.
“The legislation was aimed at preventing an imbalance of power where students were having to defend themselves against very serious charges that were being brought against them by deans and provosts,” he said.