The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Thursday, April 18, 2024 Newsletters Latest print issue

We keep you informed.

Help us keep going. Donate Today.
The Daily Tar Heel

Op-ed: Is UNC recruiting just to deny students?

On Feb. 1, 2018, UNC Chapel Hill announced that for the 13th consecutive year they received a record amount of first-year applications: 43,384 students, an increase of 6 percent more than 2016 or more than 2,500 more applicants. 

UNC put this information on its Facebook page, quoting, “We are again honored that so many wonderful students have given us the chance to get to know them through their applications.”

Looking closer at the article, a final line reads: “The University expects to enroll a first-year class of 4,205.” Of this huge amount of students who applied, only 9.7 percent will be accepted.

This begs the question: Why is UNC so eager to proclaim this amount of applications just to refuse 90 percent of them? The answer: Colleges want prestige and a high ranking on the infamous U.S. News and World Report lists. One way to get it? Low acceptance rates.

To be fair, UNC isn’t the only one playing this game. Chase Brown, a high school student from rural Texas, estimated that in his last year of high school, he received about a 100 recruitment letters, most of them from colleges he had never heard of before. On average, every time he went to get the mail, he told me, there were 2 or 3 more letters addressed to him. Colleges got hold of his address when he scored in the 98th percentile on the ACT. 

He discovered that schools pay for data about students who score in a certain range so they can send them recruitment letters. 

Are they really interested in accepting the student? Probably not, but the more applications they get, the more selective an institution appears to be and the higher it ranks. Chase became the victim of a strategy called “recruit to deny,” an aggressive technique in which colleges swarm high school students with love and attention, in hopes that they will apply to their specific institution. They send out emails, letters, brochures and inspiring welcome packages. 

The schools defend this intrusive form of outreach, arguing that they are now reaching students who would otherwise never apply. The students, on the other hand, are in for a rude awakening when, after weeks of filling in application forms, they start to receive rejection letters from schools that, just a couple of months before, had made them feel wanted. The students, so it seems, are being played. 

Having hoped that they would get into an Ivy League school, students now have to settle for whatever school they can get in, making their college experience disappointing from the start. Getting rejected by a series of different institutions, slowly realizing that maybe they weren’t that special after all, these young students start their college careers already disillusioned by higher education. 

It is a bitter and unnecessary practice that should have no place in the academic world. Offering high school students hope and then taking it away is simply cruel.

UNC ranks 30th on the U.S. News and World Report list. The website states “It is most selective, with an acceptance rate of 27 percent and an early acceptance rate of 38.2 percent.” Further on the page one can read “Our unique school spirit has been forged through more than two centuries of academic excellence, public service and athletic, professional, and personal achievement.” 

Maybe UNC should care less about those first statistics and more about the students making up that unique school spirit. One way to start: stop using the feelings of young students in a cynical game to juice the numbers.


Tine Rassalle

PhD. Candidate in Ancient Mediterranean Religions

tinerassalle@unc.edu 

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.