The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Thursday, April 25, 2024 Newsletters Latest print issue

We keep you informed.

Help us keep going. Donate Today.
The Daily Tar Heel

New bill aims to improve election finance transparency

Executive Director of Cure HTT, Marianne S. Clancy, presents Congressman David Price an award on behalf of Cure HTT in August for his work in passing legislation on behalf of those affected by the genetic disease. Price, along with Gov. Roy Cooper, opposed the the proposed Republican health care bill. 

Executive Director of Cure HTT, Marianne S. Clancy, presents Congressman David Price an award on behalf of Cure HTT in August for his work in passing legislation on behalf of those affected by the genetic disease. Price, along with Gov. Roy Cooper, opposed the the proposed Republican health care bill. 

U.S. Rep. David Price, D-N.C., introduced a bill last week that would require politically active nonprofits to disclose major donors to the IRS and the public. 

The bill is a response to the Treasury Department decision earlier this year that allows donors to these groups to remain anonymous to the IRS. This decision reversed the previous requirement for most tax-exempt groups to report the identities of major donors.

The bill, called the Spotlight Act, is a companion bill to one introduced by Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., shortly after the Treasury Department decision in July. If passed, the legislation would require the disclosure of donors who contribute $5,000 or more annually, starting with the 2018 tax year. 

“The Trump administration's decision to allow politically active organizations to obscure millions in dark campaign money further weakens our already failing campaign finance system," Price said in a press release. "At a time when our elections are plagued by unlimited corporate spending, anonymous donors and illegal foreign meddling, this action provides a mask to special interests and bad actors while diminishing the power of voters."

A press release from Price’s office said spending by these nonprofit groups is often referred to as “dark money” because of the lack of donor transparency, and wealthy donors are able to use this to influence elections.

Austin Hahn, president of UNC Young Democrats, said he views more transparency in funding as a good thing.

“It would lead to people being able to say here’s a candidate receiving money from this group and here’s where that money is coming from,” Hahn said. “I think it’s important to be able to follow the money if people are looking to make more informed decisions.”

Hahn said the bill could also make the role of large monetary donors more clear in elections.

“You’re able to take into account super rich donors on both sides contributing to candidates this way,” he said. “Putting it out in the open can combat that even if they’re still able to be that active.”

Donald Bryson, president of the conservative Civitas Institute in Raleigh, said the bill has little value. Bryson said transparency is for the government, not private citizens.

“Private citizens have the right to donate money as they see fit,” Bryson said. “This is essentially asking citizens to be transparent about where they are donating money and receiving money from and it’s a vast overreach.”

Bryson said the bill would undercut the donor safety and freedom of anonymity that was previously protected.

“The reason that the (previous) laws are in place was to protect the NAACP in the 1950s,” Bryson said. “Donors to the NAACP wouldn’t want to be disclosed due to political retribution or other physical retribution, and the laws are meant to protect the free speech of those donors.”

Hahn said his only concern with the legislation would be for the safety of donors.

“Due to the hyper-partisan nature of the time we live in, that’s the only potential downfall I could see,” Hahn said. "For instance, if I donated to a branch of Planned Parenthood, would people be combing these lists?”

But Bryson said there could be other significant consequences for nonprofit organizations.

"I think the impact of this and what Congressman Price is trying to do in my mind is trying to freeze speech through nonprofit organizations," he said. "You will see a freeze or at least a light frost in donations for nonprofit groups not only like my own but also groups like the NAACP and the League of Women Voters."

The bill would also remove the ability of the Treasury Secretary to single-handedly provide disclosure exemptions to certain nonprofit groups in the future.

“We need more transparency in our elections," Tester said in a press release. "The Spotlight Act will defend our democracy from dark money, and I'm thankful Rep. Price is helping me fight back by holding political groups accountable and shining more light on our elections."

@OlivinOnAPrayer

city@dailytarheel.com

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.