Skip to Content

Czajkowski for mayor: It’s time for a new vision for Chapel Hill, and Matt Czajkowski offers the most appealing way forward

October 21, 2009

It’s time for a new vision for Chapel Hill. Because of his fiscal prudence and emphasis on growth, Matt Czajkowski is the right choice for Chapel Hill mayor.

The city needs a break from the leadership of the last eight years, and Czajkowski can deliver on an alternate vision.

He is often the lone dissenter in the Chapel Hill Town Council; he has demonstrated that he is not afraid to take bold steps. This willingness to push the council is an important strength.

While he has shown that he is not the greatest consensus builder, during his two-year tenure as a council member, Czajkowski has helped steer the board to take timely and pragmatic stands for Carolina North and the Innovation Center.

As someone with a strong business background, Czajkowski will help the board act decisively in tough economic times.

For example, Czajkowski opposed a recent resolution granting lifetime health care benefits to town council members, demonstrating his fiscal responsibility.

Czajkowski also recognizes that the town needs to step away from mixed-use developments such as Meadowmont and Southern Village — which have not lived up to their commercial promise.

Czajkowski is the best candidate to secure future development for the town. He has stated that he wants to place an emphasis on bringing new retailers and high-density commercial destinations to help the town generate more revenue. But he is also cognizant that massive growth is not going to happen, and that it is not what Chapel Hill wants.

He plans to push a broader panhandling resolution through the council, pointing to Burlington, Vt., as a successful model.

Czajkowski recognizes the dire need for additional downtown parking, with the understanding that the lack of parking is hurting business.

He would be the strongest advocate for building new parking structures, recognizing the success Durham has had by using parking to lure businesses.

The mayor is essentially a figurehead for the town. Czajkowski’s vision for the future of Chapel Hill is what we need for the next two years.

Czajkowski has stressed that the mayor’s role is to conduct fair, balanced and open discussion on the council. We believe he will be able to do this.

Why not Kleinschmidt

While Mark Kleinschmidt has demonstrated strong leadership over the past eight years, it’s time for a new direction for Chapel Hill.

Under his leadership, Chapel Hill became more friendly to businesses without harming the unique feel of Chapel Hill through the creation of the Economic Development Office.

He is interested in soliciting citizen input, and has shown a willingness to listen to citizen concerns. He understands the need to push resolutions through the council as quickly as possible, but has stated that he will not truncate this process to the point that citizen input is eliminated.

While admirable, we believe that Kleinschmidt’s priorities are more focused on social justice than economic prosperity, which should be the No. 1 priority now.

Kleinschmidt has served the council well and has many excellent ideas. But he simply represents the status quo.

This is a personality driven race, and we think it’s time for a fresh face.

Why not Cho

While Augustus Cho has some innovative ideas about Chapel Hill’s public transportation system and public safety issues, many of his ideas are simply unfeasible.

Most notably, his plan to turn two blocks of Franklin Street into a “park” seems quixotic. And his proposed increase in sales tax is certainly not the best idea now — especially because of its regressive nature.

In addition, he has not had any experience on the council, which he would lead if elected mayor.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Montgomery Burns for Mayor!

I just love the logic here:

This is a personality driven race, so let's vote for the guy that doesn't build consensus and is primarily motivated by money. Sure, that makes sense!

It is a clear choice:

Mark Kleinschmidt, an experienced, consensus builder (and UNC alum!) who reaches out to all citizens -- rich, poor, gay, straight, black, white, Latino -- and believes in moderate, well-planned growth and improvement through a participatory, community-engaged process.

Or a less experienced curmudgeonly Mr. Burns type who doesn't play well with others and wants to turn a pedestrian and bike friendly town into a parking lot.

Pitting the choice as social justice vs. economic prosperity is false. With Kleinschmidt you get both.

With Czajkowski you get a cartoon.

Best Candidate

I am taken aback by this endorsement by the DTH. You say Czajkowski "has shown that he is not the greatest consensus builder" and that he is often a lone dissenter. How does this help him when he is essentially a figurehead of the town? If none of the council members are going to want to work with him and he is constantly objecting how is anything going to get done?

Czajkowski has had many contributions to his campaign, go and take a look at them at the State Board of Elections website http://www.app.sboe.state.nc.us/webapps/cf_rpt_search/cf_report_detail.aspx?RID=101077&TP=REC , most are in the $250 dollar amount, while Kleinschmidt is participating in the only Voter Owned Elections program in the state where contributions may not exceed $20.

"It is in the public interest that the detrimental effects of increasingly large amounts of money being raised and spent in Chapel Hill to influence the outcome of municipal elections be minimized and that the meaningful participation of all citizens in the democratic process be enhanced." - Voter Owned Elections Ordinance

I was a college student a year ago, and I didn't have near $250 to contribute to a campaign, Kleinschmidt has shown that he values all residents of our town equally and not just the people living near the country club.

I made this comment on an earlier story

after the first day of early voting on the 19th relating to student outreach. I'll leave it in tact the same way I said it before the DTH made an endorsement since it also seems somewhat relevant here:

"I saw you guys were putting out the voting guide soon (thanks to Sarah posting on OrangePolitics.com) & it got me thinking how few candidates turned out for the 1st day early voting which is usually a big day for it. MaryAnne for school board was there at the Planetarium, and Laurin for council was on campus too, and Mark Kleinschmidt (a former UNC student) for mayor had a whole team of volunteers out at the quad, the pit, and the planetarium (organized by our student volunteers group & assisted by the UNC Young Dem student group) & we had a campaign flyer (also designed by a student) that spoke to student issues that included info on when & how to early vote, & we even had a Rickshaw/Pedicab thing ferrying people to the Planetarium & back so they wouldn’t have to be late to class just to vote. I hope as early voting continues we see more candidates taking the time for student outreach."

Part-timer's Priorities firmly misplaced

"we believe that Kleinschmidt’s priorities are more focused on social justice than economic prosperity"

But Czajkowski and Tar Heel editorial board place Profits over People?

Also Matt explains his non-attendence at various committee meetings.

Czajkowski: "I understood that being a Council member is a part time job."

Brilliant Choice for a Brilliant Town

The Editors are to be commended for endorsing Matt Czajkowski for Mayor. He will bring prudent judgment, balance, experience and the training of a Harvard MBA to lead our Town. He accomplished everything his last campaign platform proposed. He can and he will bring about the changes for downtown, panhandling, lighting, parking and all the other issues his former Town Council members have been hiding from for so many years. He will bring a new approach to economic development, which has been an abysmal failure under the leadership of Mark Kleinschmidt, and try to improve the mix of businesses and jobs so Chapel Hill becomes a place to work as well as live and study. He pushed hard to get Carolina North's development agreement through the stubborn Council by setting goals and a timeline. He builds smart consensus, not political deals. He had the courage to stand up to the stream of "Foy Robots" for two years. Look at his web site www.mattformayor.org clip Downtown Renaissance. This guy might just be the miracle worker our debt ridden Town needs. Well done, Editors!

Are you kidding?

Is this a joke? Did I fall asleep and suddenly it's April 1?
Mr. Czajkowski has been nothing but divisive and alienating while he has been on the Town Council. He is often the only dissenting vote. How does this lend itself to the conclusion that he is the right man for the job?
The article notes that Czajkowski is "not the greatest consensus builder." I think this is a necessary skill for a mayor. The article also notes that Czajkowski could "push" the Town Council in a new direction. Frankly, I don't want anyone pushing the Town Council in any direction.
Finally, the article's basis, that Chapel Hill needs a "break" from the leadership of the last 8 years, is ridiculous. Was anything wrong for the past 8 years? No.
It may be fun to voice an unpopular opinion in these endorsements, but at least have an argument that makes an ounce of sense.

Dismayed by endorsement

I am quite dismayed by the Daily Tar Heel's decision to endorse Matt Czajkowski for Chapel Hill mayor. Mark Kleinschmidt is clearly the best choice for our town given his tenure on the council, his experience as a consensus builder, and his service as the Chair of the Council Committee on Economic Development, among many other fine qualities. Mr. Kleinschmidt is committed to social justice, which I count very high on the list of priorities. He has also garnered a number of important endorsements, including the Sierra Club, the UNC Young Democrats, the Independent Weekly, and the Anderson-Thorpe Breakfast Club (the political arm of the local NAACP).

I am very interested in

I am very interested in hearing how important "experience" and being a "consensus builder" was when you were determining to support for president last year. I would bet the house that you voted for Obama while McCain was far and away the more experienced candidate with a record of building consensus with Senators across the aisle.

If you support Kleinschmidt, that's fine. But tell us the truth--that it's because he's a very liberal Democrat--and nothing else.

That isn't really a fair

That isn't really a fair point, different candidates, different elections, different situations all together.

Someone may have supported McCain because of McCain-Feingold, but Kleinschmidt because of Voter Owned Elections. Lets not jump to conclusions about how people voted for President just because they are voting a certain way in the Chapel Hill town elections that's a big stretch.