URL: http://www.dailytarheel.com/index.php/article/2010/09/can_you_really_have_love_at_rst_sex
Current Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 01:46:11 -0400
I’ll admit it. I’ve had sex on the first date.
Actually, I’ve had sex before the first date, or any dates for that matter.
Ok, I agree it’s not terribly earth-shattering. A lot of people enjoy casual, non-romantic sex, but I get the same question over and over: “Don’t you want a boyfriend?” to which I respond with a firm and decidedly non-desperate “Yeah. Sure.”
Of course I want to find love. Of course I enjoy casual sex. But are the two mutually exclusive?
Can a person really find “the one” among the one-night stands?
Well, fret not, strumpets and jezebels, science has come to save the day. Anthony Paik, sociology researcher at the University of Iowa, took on this exact question in last month’s issue of Social Science Research.
Using the responses of 642 adults in the Chicago Health and Social Life Survey, Paik assessed their relationship quality with their partners. Then he compared it with the relationship context in which they and their partners first started having sex.
Let’s start with the bad news. People who became sexually involved earlier in a non-romantic context (hookups, friends with benefits, casual dating) tended to report a lower relationship quality than those who waited.
But here’s the good news. This finding could be completely explained by selection, not causation. People who don’t want a serious relationship are more likely to hook up, and if you factored them out, there was no significant difference in relationship quality.
In other words, partners who start off hooking up can have relationships just as strong as partners who delay having sex. They just have to want it.
It sounds improbable, but not implausible. For example, a couple of years ago, I met a man we’ll call “Juan” for casual sex, but something about him drew me in. I wanted to see him again, and so I asked him out.
We ended up having a successful and loving relationship. Nevertheless, my experience feels more like an exception than the rule. Was Juan just a fluke? Not according to Paik.
Now, I’m not proposing that everyone should be having casual sex with each other, as titillating as that sounds. There are benefits to waiting, and casual intimacy simply doesn’t work for everyone.
But let’s stop assuming that casual sexual encounters can’t grow into something more. Let’s open ourselves up to the possibility that people who hook up might also want to take that next step.
As Kathleen Bogle of La Salle University observed on college campuses, a “hook up” can lead to “hook ups,” then “hanging out,” and eventually the elusive, exclusive “going out.”
As always with sex, you should be smart and stay safe. Also, you should be clear about what you want. Those same selection factors can make it seem like you don’t want a serious relationship, or attract others who don’t want one.
Finally, I should point out that the study only looked at heterosexual adults, as there weren’t enough same-gender partners in the survey. So this conclusion may not apply to LGBTQ relationships like mine.
Even so, this still gives me hope. I can find another Juan, and maybe next time he’ll be the Juan.
Perry Tsai is a Sexual Health Columnist for The Daily Tar Heel. He is a second year medical student from New Orleans, La. Contact him at perrytsai@gmail.com
Do you think fracking can be done safely?
WOOOOOO YEAH PERRY!!!!!!
I used to start my own columns with some wild tales, but this one takes the cake.
One of the columns last week discussed how liberal this campus is… The thing I’ve noticed is how liberal we are with the term “science”. To me, nothing in this article indicates that it was a scientific study. In addition, you seem to draw a couple dubious conclusions from the study, and I’d really love to see the quotes from the study supporting the “good news” you provided after the seemingly obvious “bad news”.
Perry is a so called “sexual health” columnist, but I see absolutely nothing sexually healthy about what he is advocating. He can use this so called “study” to try to justify his own actions, but he most certainly shouldn’t go around proclaiming that this is a positive (and “proven”) healthy way to form relationships.
Could I borrow the epic alliterative adjective pair of “elusive, exclusive” please? I’ll not mention that while this column was a fun read, I didn’t really get what the overall conclusion was…oops…damn, well I’m stealing it then!
Thank you for writing such an engaging article! Sex is a big part of what we young adults are thinking about all day, so it’s fun to read a slightly risqué article that acknowledges this. Whether you agree with the conclusion drawn by Perry, at least it’s actually interesting to read about.
I myself met my wife at a glory hole in Davis library.
Addy: apparently, reading about other people’s healthy, comfortable sex lives makes you defensive and depressed. I hope, for your sake, that there exists someone out there who is interested in a lame, sexless relationship with a wet blanket like you. You need to get laid, and fast. Perry: Thanks for the brilliant, pro-sex, pro-conversation piece :)
Thanks for debunking some myths! While I am sure we all have our own preferences for when to be sexual and how to start a relationship, it is nice to know that starting something out with a hookup isn’t the end of things before they start if it turns out your hookup really grabs and shakes you in more ways than one:)
RMcMeezy, why don’t you go read the study —“Hookups,” dating, and relationship quality: Does the type of sexual involvement matter? – Anthony Paik—for yourself before making assumptions about the quality of the source?
I’m not making assumptions about the quality of the source. I am just of the opinion that there is no truly scientific way to measure relationship quality. And I thought that the article could use some more quotes. It’s unclear whether the author is reiterating a point that Paik made or if he is interpreting the data in his own new way.
The Daily Tar Heel reserves the right to remove any comment deemed racially derogatory, inflammatory, or spammatory. Repeat offenders may have their IP address banned from posting future comments. Please be nice.
If this is the first time you've commented, your comment won't appear until you've verified your email address.
Flag this comment