As the University prepares to release the first public draft of its new academic plan, steering committee members say they are concerned about the image the plan will project to the people of North Carolina.
The success or failure of the plan — a blueprint that guides the development and implementation of major policy and funding initiatives — will ultimately depend on the financial support that the University receives from tuition and state tax revenues, making public perception a pressing concern for the committee.
“I’m worried about the moral context of this plan,” said Dr. Warren Newton, committee member and chair of the department of family medicine, during a meeting of the committee on Friday. The plan is expected to be released for public comment in less than four weeks.
“The state is devastated, and we have to ground this plan within the needs of the state,” Newton said.
That could include a reorganization of the plan’s language to better reflect the tangible economic and cultural benefits the plan and the University will provide the state as well as shifting faculty concerns to a later portion of the 26-page document, committee members said.
Faculty development is the second in an unordered list of six thematic topics that guide the plan, and the call for improved faculty benefits — spousal hiring practices, competitive compensation packages and revision of promotion policies, among other changes — caused several committee members to urge caution at Friday’s meeting.
“We can’t come across as whining,” said committee member and psychology professor Gina Carelli. “The last thing we want to do is antagonize the state.”
As the talking points of the plan bounce around the public sphere in the coming months, the committee says it wants to emphasize themes other than faculty development.
“The inclusion of big-ticket items will come across as self-serving, and it will be hard to hear the rest,” said committee member Stephen Farmer, director of undergraduate admissions.