URL: http://www.dailytarheel.com/index.php/article/2011/01/student_leaders_must_align_with_vision
Current Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 02:54:43 -0400
The head of the UNC system’s student leadership organization is threatening to fire any of his officers who publicly criticize it.
On Friday Atul Bhula, president of the UNC Association of Student Governments, sent an e-mail to the association’s executive officers, directing them against freely corresponding with the press and speaking negatively about the association.
In the e-mail, Bhula warns officers that endorsing student body president candidates whose platforms don’t align with the “vision” of ASG will result in dismissal.
The association includes delegates from all 17 UNC-system schools and is funded by $1 annually in student fees, which pays for officer stipends and travel costs to monthly meetings throughout the state.
Members of the UNC College Republicans, who are campaigning to put the University’s participation in the association to a vote, said the e-mail demonstrates how closed the association is to criticism.
Anthony Dent, chairman of College Republicans, said for an organization that represents students, the e-mail is not a good example of transparency.
“It’s a great arrangement for Atul and other officers of ASG because they all have huge stipends and get to attend monthly meetings in four star hotels,” Dent said.
But Bhula, whose annual stipend is $7,000, said he was reminding officers of the association’s ethics act which prevents them from getting involved with campus elections.
Getting involved with campus politics as an ASG officer can interfere with representing students on the state level, he said.
“My e-mail was to address that point right there in addition to an anti-ASG stance,” Bhula said. “The way I see it is, if you’re anti-ASG then why are you working for us?”
Rick Ingram, a delegate of the association who is running for student body president at UNC, said the e-mail sounded like a threat.
“I was a little bit disappointed in it just because I think it’s taking an overly aggressive tone. When in reality, we’re just trying to question whether we’re getting the most out of what we’re putting into it,” he said.
In a recent editorial in the Carolina Review, Marc Seelinger, associate editor of The Carolina Review and the appointed ASG cessation czar of College Republicans, writes that Bhula’s e-mail is an example of “authoritarian” rule that allows for little criticism of the organization and how it is funded.
Seelinger said the e-mail proves the association feels threatened by the College Republicans petitioning to allow for a student referendum on ASG’s fee.
So far, Seelinger estimates the College Republicans have collected 600 signatures in support of the student referendum. They need more than 2,900 signatures in total.
Junior Dakota Williams, who is ASG’s senior vice president, said despite the movements made against ASG, members of the College Republicans have never contacted the association.
“All we hear is that ‘you’re doing it wrong,’” he said.
Williams said ASG is not opposed to criticism if it is constructive.
“We at ASG are certainly receptive to change,” he said. “We are open to opinions.”
Contact the State and National Editor at state@dailytarheel.com.
Do you think fracking can be done safely?
I’m sure his belief that it was an “overly aggressive tone” had nothing to do with his campaign manager selling out to become an ASG executive officer.
And on the same day the DTH Edit Board lauds one of his opponents too? Poor Rick…
Greg, please get a life.
While anyone is welcome to their own opinion regarding ASG or any other student organization. Those who are working FOR the organization should not be speaking against the organization. If the Vice chancellor or any other memeber of UNC administration spoke negatively about the organization they would not be allowed to continue in their position. An officer that publically defames an organization they serve are in fact, critizing their own effectiveness. Everyone can find areas of improvement in any organization they are a part of. However, they are to be addressed in the appropriate manner and not used as political capital in the community or institutiton. This makes since.
As a delegate of ASG, I hope to fix any problems and inform the media and the public about our progress. There is no same in identifying problems….but to only point out the negative aspects to the public and be paid by the organization at the same time… is irresponbsible and deserves to step down.
David Lambert
UNCG
sense***
sent from my iphone
This sort of authoritarianism serves two purposes. First, it intimidates people within the organization who might have concerns about the mission, goals, procedures, etc., etc. from voicing those opinions. In this way, it has a chilling effect on free speech.
Secondly, it is also a not-so-subtle attempt to interfere with our campus politics. ASG should have zero say in who UNC students (whether or not they happen to work for ASG) ultimately support for SBP, Congress, etc. Campus elections are about what is best for UNC, not ASG. If a student believes that a particular candidate is the best choice for UNC (and the candidate happens to have issues with ASG), then the student should not have to worry about getting fired over that decision. He should be free to support whoever he wants, regardless of that candidate’s position on ASG. Furthermore, if a candidate happens to be the best choice for UNC (in the determination of the student), but somehow harmful to ASG, what does that say about ASG?
You are correct in that if a candidate or anyone associated with a candidate disagreed with ASG policies and/or its purpose in general they should be allowed to voice their opinion……
In that same token, if an ASG officer (not delegate mind you) disagrees with the purpose of ASG then they are free to step down from their position.
I am neither a student at UNC-CH nor am I particularly concerned in its politics. I am just trying to be reasonable. Being employed by a group means that you have a certain allegiance to that group…unless some immoral act or grave injustice takes place that would cause the employee to step down. In other words, if someone disagrees with ASG …. then they should not be employed by ASG. THey should stick to their guns… and resign. Unless it is good for them in one way, and not another.
If ASG doesn’t work….then part of that responsibility lies on those employed to do the work of the organization.
Criticism isn’t always a binary situation. Bhula realizes a person can still believe in the general mission of the ASG, while having doubts and concerns about the organization, right? Perhaps this sort of leadership has been the reason why the ASG is (or has become) a purely symbolica organization for resume builders from ECU to get into an MBA program at Appalachian State.
The Daily Tar Heel reserves the right to remove any comment deemed racially derogatory, inflammatory, or spammatory. Repeat offenders may have their IP address banned from posting future comments. Please be nice.
If this is the first time you've commented, your comment won't appear until you've verified your email address.
Flag this comment