URL: http://www.dailytarheel.com/index.php/article/2011/02/charter_more_charters
Current Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 03:02:06 -0400
Right now the number of charter schools in North Carolina is capped by the legislature at 100. A bill to eliminate the cap just passed the state Senate and will soon see debate in the state House. Eliminating the cap on charters would be good for North Carolina; the General Assembly should continue to work to pass the bill.
Charters are publicly funded K-12 schools that have fewer restrictions than traditional public schools. They have more freedom when it comes to educational focus, teacher hiring and administrative decision making.
Whether the North Carolina Association of Educators likes it or not, getting rid of the charter cap would be good for the UNC community because it would increase diversity by giving future teachers and students more opportunity.
Many UNC students consider going into teaching but do not want to major in education. Increasing the number of charter schools would provide more options for students who want to follow a nontraditional path to teaching because charter schools have less stringent teacher certification requirements.
Eliminating the cap would also increase diversity within the UNC student population. Charter schools allow more choice in education and provide opportunities for students who struggle in traditional public schools.
Private school is not an option for many students whose educational needs are not met by their assigned public school. Charter schools are free and provide a valuable opportunity to serve students with different learning needs. This kind of choice in education allows students to find a school that fits their needs and have a better chance at success in college.
N.C. charter schools consistently rank among the best in the country and have long waiting lists. North Carolina charter schools are a story of success; the General Assembly should act to expand opportunity to more students by eliminating the cap.
Do you think fracking can be done safely?
How diverse are NC charter schools? How many provide services to less affluent (free-and-reduced lunch) children? How many charter schools in NC are failing to properly educate children? How are charter schools measured to insure that they are adequately performing?
This editorial was written like a press release for charter schools and fails to acknowledge the need for legislation to insure that if the schools are expanded that they are held to the same basic standards as public schools and have diversity in their enrollment. There are good charter schools and there are bad ones. The editorial needs to take a look beyond just the ones which perform well.
The NC and national PTA have expressed concerns on these topics that the editorial board needs to study.
This just…I can’t even…
This might be the most poorly researched article ever. You know what no regulation by the state means? It means that charter schools are responsible for creating their own curriculum and standards. Which in turn means that these children aren’t learning what they need to. My experience with charter schools in North Carolina involved a head of school that just chose to not formulate a curriculum. And know how they hired their teachers? They just placed random ads and took whoever they could get. Everyone is reapplying for their jobs in the next two months, because they’re not effectively doing their jobs. And know how this happened? It’s a pet project, as most charter schools are, of someone with a lot of money who has actually no experience with teaching or schools or education. Just because someone has a lofty goal of creating a whole new way of education does not mean they can actually do it.
Want to know how many schools in North Carolina had to rehire their staff because they were qualified as failing? 16. Out of 2534. And I can guarantee more than that one charter is having those problems.
And next time do your research a little better. The North Carolina Republicans also just decided that charter schools no longer have to be racially representative of the areas they’re serving. Which means that a rich white member of the community who is tired of seeing all the middle class and upper class students having to attend school with (gasp!) poor minorities can create their own charter and take us back to those segregated school days. Which will then take the money that these white kids are bringing into these schools, and make the education situation even worse for these poor minorities.
Also, all these Carolina students that want to teach but didn’t major in teaching? Go get your masters in teaching. Most of us are planning on going to grad school anyway. Very few people can walk into a classroom and be an effective teacher. And you implying that they can discredits teachers and the hard work that they put into their job every single day in order to give this country a bright future. Shame on you.
Next time know what you’re talking about before you act like it’s the greatest invention since sliced bread. If you really want education reform, you should suggest that all these people pouring their money into charters figure out a way to give it to our public schools that often don’t even get enough funds to buy supplies thanks to constant budget cuts. Which have gotten worse due to the Republican majority in the North Carolina legislature.
@Lucy,
the whole idea with charter schools is that the curriculum is decided on a local level not forced by the man, and its up to the parent’s to keep everyone in check. Thats right, the parents. imagine that, parents being involved in their kids education. The failures you have mentioned are parental failures. Liberals should stop blaming society and force the parents to take charge. Its a sad state of affairs when parents have to be forced to take charge.
@wish you had put your name, but I wouldn’t have either if I had actually written that comment.
That’s actually NOT the whole idea behind charter schools. The whole idea behind charter schools is to try out solutions to public school problems that can then be duplicated on a larger scale. However, most of the “solutions” attempted by charter schools are not able to be enacted on such a large scale. So the ones that actually show positive results end up being exclusive schools that only a few lucky students who win a lottery are able to get into.
And I’m confused as to which failures I mentioned are in any way related to parents involvement in kids’ education. The administrative problems of charter schools? The fact that they no longer have to be racially representative? Unqualified teachers? Segregated schools? Yes, parents should be involved in their child’s education. It poses a significant problem when kids are entering kindergarten without receiving any educational experience at home and when they don’t receive educational support at home. But if parents were supposed to be in charge of said education, everyone would be home schooled. However, parents do not have teaching degrees (just like many charter school teachers!). In predominantly minority lower class neighborhoods, parents often don’t even have a high school diploma. Which is why we have licensed teachers and public schools. Charter schools were in no way created to hold parents accountable. In fact, they often try to separate children from their home life as much as possible because they think that taking those kids out of potentially harmful home situations will improve their education. Is that putting parents in charge of their kids’ education? No. It’s not. It’s actually the opposite. And while some do try to work with families, so do public schools. Ever heard of a parent/teacher conference?
The idea behind charters as has already been mentioned, is that charters are supposed to offer a DIFFERENT kind of approach to curriculum than public school offers. The most important thing to remember is that parents send their kids to charters by choice. So, if a charter school has terrible teachers/ bad performance, then parents have the CHOICE to take them out. In public schools, there are plenty of horrible teachers but as a parent you have no choice but to drop your kid off everyday. So, it sort of is in the parents’ hands to decide if the charter is good or not. If nobody wants to go, then the school will shut down. On the flip side, if more charters pop up and people begin to have the choice to flee a bad performing public school, then so be it.
As for the diversity issue, it all comes down to transportation. The problem is that students can come from any county in NC and attend any charter school, so how in the world would a charter be expected to provide buses to all the students coming from all over? There are many charters I have visited that strive to get more underrepresented populations in… but they can’t just pick up one kid 5 miles to the east and then go 15 miles south and then pick up one more kid 12 miles in the opposite direction.
Finally, it is most important that parents are aware of what their child’s teachers are like, what is going on in the class, and the climate of the school day. Parents are the most important group of people who can change the failures of our schools, whether it is a charter or public.
Yes, charter schools are supposed to provide a different kind of curriculum. The problem is you typically end up with people who have no experience running a school or creating curriculum attempting to formulate one.
Imagine this scenario: you’re a single minority mother with two kids. You dropped out of high school at the age of 16 because you had to go to work to support yourself and your family. You want what’s best for your kids, especially their education, because you don’t want them to end up in the same situation you did. One day, you hear about a new charter school opening up nearby that promises a new way of learning, amazing test scores, and almost guaranteed college admission. Why wouldn’t you send your kids? Marketing is extremely important in these areas and since most charter schools are run by people with business degrees, they are extremely skilled at marketing.
It is difficult for many parents with college degrees to go into their child’s school and judge the quality of the institution. It is that much harder for a parent who didn’t graduate high school or get an opportunity to attend college to walk into a school and attempt to take charge of their child’s learning by judging what’s being taught and the quality of the learning environment. While this is typically an option for middle and upper class white families, it’s just not realistic for poor minorities.
There are bad teachers and failing schools. However, the formation of charters has become a convenient way to appear to be solving the problem when we’re actually just ignoring it. These failing schools are the ones that need more funds for things like supplies, tutors, supplemental teacher pay to attract top talent, etc. However, the more charters we create, the more state and federal funds are allocated for them and the less funds that are available to public schools. And education budgets aren’t getting any bigger.
Yes, transportation is an issue. But identifying it as a cause of the problem doesn’t change the fact that a. it’s not a solution and b. charter schools are still increasingly more segregated.
Parental support for education is ideal, and studies have shown that it increases school performance. However, teachers have to go to work every day and overcome home situations. Whether it’s as severe as an abusive parent or a situation where you have a single parent working two jobs in order to keep food on the table and who just doesn’t have time to sit down with their kid and talk about what happened in school that day or to try to help them with their homework.
Unless you’re a teacher in a KIPP school. KIPP schools have an extensive application process to weed out the kids that don’t have sufficient family support outside of the classroom. Therefore, they are only accepting kids that are predisposed to achieve well and leaving the kids who might need some extra help to the public school system. Convenient.
Lucy- any parent concerned about the performance of his or her child’s school can go to www.ncreportcards.org.
This website contains academic performance for each school (including charters) in each subject and grade, and compared to each county and the rest of the state.
It also includes comparison info on class sizes; school safety/crime rates; the percentage of certified teachers, teacher turnover rate, teachers with advanced degrees; and the percentage of student attendance rates.
A little research for any given charter school will tell you where it stands compared to other schools in the county and state— all based on the same stats and test scores. A parent can look at any school report card and say “kids in this school are far below the norm for this county and state so I wont send them there,” or “hey, these kids are performing exceptionally well compared to every other school in my county!”
So, although you say there is little state regulation, the academic performance of charter schools can still be evaluated.
That is a wonderful resource and should definitely be utilized. However, you’re assuming that everyone knows about this website and has internet access to use it.
As of 2009, only 30% of North Carolina residents without a high school degree and over the age of 25 had internet access in their homes. 51% of blacks and 48% of Hispanics have home internet access, as compared to 74% of non-Hispanic whites. North Carolina ranked 41st in the nation in home internet access. Yes, there is internet access in libraries and potentially at jobs, but that only slightly addresses this problem. (http://www2.journalnow.com/news/2009/jun/04/nc-ranks-41st-in-those-with-internet-access-in-the-ar-143927/)
When this resource is used, I’m sure it’s extremely helpful to parents in learning more about their child’s school. However, it’s important to realize that this kind of system has specific limitations, such as internet access and the ability of parents/family members/legal guardians being able to interpret the data.
The Daily Tar Heel reserves the right to remove any comment deemed racially derogatory, inflammatory, or spammatory. Repeat offenders may have their IP address banned from posting future comments. Please be nice.
If this is the first time you've commented, your comment won't appear until you've verified your email address.
Flag this comment