In discussions regarding the UNC system’s inevitable reduction in state funding, administrators have repeatedly said that “protecting the academic core” remains their priority.
But after four years of cuts totaling about $600 million, provosts and faculty at universities across the system indicate that the core has already been compromised, and it could be significantly damaged this year if the Republican leadership’s proposal to reduce funding by 17.4 percent is approved.
There is not a clear definition for a university’s academic core, said Jim Martin, secretary of the UNC-system faculty assembly.
“Academic core is a word that gets thrown around a lot,” he said. “But it has been very poorly defined.”
Administrators have good intentions in trying to protect the academic core, but they also want to say they’re protecting it to look good politically, he said.
“Yes, it is rhetoric,” he said. “And yes, it is trying to mitigate the damage.”
Bruce Carney, provost and executive vice chancellor at UNC-CH, said the academic core can’t be quantitatively defined.
“The key word here is ‘academic’ — that is, the instructional mission of the University,” he said.
“We start with the undergraduate experience,” Carney said. “That would be the real core of the University.”