Chapel Hill Town Council OKs homeless shelter move

Residents say their safety concerns were not addressed

By Sarah Glen
Updated: 05/25/11 1:35pm
  Email this article  |      Share on Delicious  Share on Digg
Tools

 
Possibly Related

After more than three years of contentious debate, the Chapel Hill Town Council approved a special-use permit Monday night that will allow for the expansion of a local homeless shelter.

The Inter-Faith Council for Social Service’s Community House men’s shelter will move from its 100 W. Rosemary St. location to 1315 Martin Luther Kind Jr. Blvd. and will offer 52 permanent beds and 17 emergency cots in a two-story building.

IFC Executive Director Chris Moran said the organization will now go through a zoning compliance permit process for the $3.5 million to $4 million project that will take about four months.

“There’s a lot of detailed work that we have to do, but the hardest parts are behind us,” he said. “The project sounds more believable than it did before the council’s approval, so it’s easier for funders to respond.”

But the shelter’s move was not met with unanimous approval.

Residents of the neighboring Homestead Park community have opposed the move since it was first announced in 2008, citing safety, over-concentration of services and the possibility of the shelter housing sex offenders as their key concerns.

Neighboring resident Lisa Ostrom said she doesn’t think any of the community’s concerns have been addressed.

“There are no conditions in the special-use permit to provide any neighborhood protection,” she said. “This means that the applicant has promised to do some things and we have to take it on faith that they will make good on a 50-year promise.”

Council members Matt Czajkowski and Laurin Easthom voted against the approval at Monday night’s meeting with these concerns in mind.

Czajkowski said he would have preferred to approve the move but continue discussion of the emergency cot system — which prompted an elevated level of concern from residents — during the four-to-five-year construction phase of the project.

“You have a whole group of neighbors who basically feel as though very little of what they asked for ended up in the (special-use permit),” he said. “Their voices were not really paid much heed.”

Moran said the emergency cots are a crucial part of the project.
“Not having them would be like building a hospital without an emergency room,” he said.

To promote further discussion between the shelter and its neighbors, the council stipulated that the IFC craft a Good Neighbor Plan and present it to the council before the lease is completed.

A draft of the plan includes running background checks on clients and monitoring resident behavior to prevent loitering, littering or harmful behavior. But Moran said the first step will be to listen to what all the parties involved have to say.

“We have been instructed to get this moving, and that’s what we’re going to do,” he said. “This is a plan that we want to be able to live by and want a majority of the neighbors to live with.”

Contact the City Editor at city@dailytarheel.com.

Published May 10, 2011 in Chapel Hill Town Council, City

2 comments

Thank God
May 12, 2011 at 1:20 AM
Flag this comment

Finally! Obviously nobody, no community, no neighborhood wants a homeless shelter moved near them. But in many ways it’s better than having UNC students, who will direct the future of our local communities and nation as a whole, safe from these people. Violent acts from these residents has risen steadily in the past 5 years largely due to the appeal that panhandling on Franklin and neighboring streets offers homeless people. Without such incentives (relocation), the residents will have less incentives to carry out related behavior. And most important to me, it will clean up the UNC campus.

Consider the scenario of a prospective UNC student and/or his or her family:

Read more …

“I like this school, I love this campus…but I don’t feel safe with all the bums and riff raff….”


rabbit
May 12, 2011 at 10:53 AM
Flag this comment

Yeah, “Thank God,” it’s WAY worse to have some panhandling downtown or adult aged UNC students faced with issues of real poverty than to put potential sex offenders next to one of the most heavily used playgrounds/park in the county and in a residential neighborhood full of children.

 
Join the discussion
You Should Know

The Daily Tar Heel reserves the right to remove any comment deemed racially derogatory, inflammatory, or spammatory. Repeat offenders may have their IP address banned from posting future comments. Please be nice.

If this is the first time you've commented, your comment won't appear until you've verified your email address.

Formatting Options:
  • Links: "my link":http://my.url.com
  • Bold: *something!*
  • Italic: _OMG!_
Powered by Detroit Softworks