"Not guilty' say Occupy Chapel Hill defendants

The Occupy Chapel Hill movement took to the streets, protesting arrests.

By Chelsey Dulaney
Updated: 11/21/11 11:56pm
  Email this article  |      Share on Delicious  Share on Digg
Tools

 

Protestors at the Occupy Chapel Hill movement marched down Franklin Street to Greenbridge and back down Rosemary Street to their camp in front of the Post Office on Thursday night.

Possibly Related

Occupy Chapel Hill took to the streets again Thursday night, less than a week after seven protesters were arrested during what many believed to be an overly aggressive police raid.

More than 50 protesters marched down Franklin and Rosemary streets, walking in solidarity with the seven protesters who were arrested in Sunday’s raid for breaking into the former Yates Motor Company building on West Franklin Street.

The seven defendants pled not guilty to misdemeanor charges of breaking and entering in Orange County District Court earlier that morning.

The defendants, Ellen Crawford, 23, of Richmond, Va.; Kassandra Ofray, 21, of Pittsboro; Jack Ryan Jarrell, 24, and David Maliken, 24, of Carrboro; and Eva Jones, 22, Daniel Regenscheit, 27, and Monica Ganguly, 29, of Chapel Hill, will reappear in court Jan. 30.

Outside the courthouse, a group of about 10 people held signs that condemned the use of force by the Chapel Hill Police Department in the raid.

The department has been criticized for its use of forceful tactics to break up the gathering last Sunday.

Jose Hernandez, who was holding a sign that read “CHPD: Defy Unjust Orders Now,” said the group protesting outside the courthouse was there to support the seven defendants.

“We’re protesting the unnecessary use of force by the Chapel Hill Police against the people inside,” Hernandez said.

Judge Lunsford Long also lifted the defendants’ restriction from being on Franklin Street, which was put in place after the raid Sunday.

The new order bans the defendant’s presence within 50 feet of the former Yates building, with the exception that they can drive by in a motor vehicle.

The Thursday night walk, which lasted about 30 minutes, was monitored by at least four police escorts who helped stop traffic.

Though many came out to support the defendants, some Occupy Chapel Hill members say the arrests have created internal dissent among those who wanted to keep the protests peaceful and legal.

During a Sunday night march protesting the police raid and arrests that day, members chanted criticisms of law enforcement.

But similar chants were quickly hushed in Thursday’s march. The group of occupiers also collectively agreed to not destroy public property.

Heather Epes, a Carrboro resident, said the raid and arrests on Sunday gave the group a chance to reevaluate their goals and tactics.

“We had this very jarring thing happen,” she said. “We’ve had a chance to take a big breath.”

She said she will still support the occupation.

“In some ways, I feel I have been occupying my whole life,” she said.

And many Occupy Chapel Hill members say the police controversy has increased community support.

Cammie Bellamy, a sophomore journalism major, who said she has been involved with Occupy Chapel Hill since protesters began occupying the Peace and Justice Plaza in Chapel Hill on Oct. 15, said the movement has inspired her.

“I think this is the biggest, most visible movement of my lifetime,” she said.

Staff Writer Conor Furlong contributed to reporting.

Contact the City Editor at city@dailytarheel.com.

Published November 17, 2011 in City

9 comments

Couch surfer
November 18, 2011 at 10:24 AM
Flag this comment

Can you defendants make your home addresses public? I need a place to crash tonight. Don’t worry, I wouldn’t be any problem at all. You don’t even need to be there- I’ll let myself right in. That’s legal, right?


Hugo
November 18, 2011 at 10:46 AM
Flag this comment

“But similar chants were quickly hushed in Thursday’s march. The group of occupiers also collectively agreed to not destroy public property.”

The fact that they even had to discuss this says alot.


@Couch surfer
November 18, 2011 at 11:07 AM
Flag this comment

You’re welcome to crash at my house if you need shelter, just be aware that, unlike the Chrysler building, it hasn’t been left vacant for 8 years.


Lee
November 18, 2011 at 11:16 AM
Flag this comment

Everybody who wants to occupy the occupiers, you don’t have to wait for the protestors to tell you their addresses. Just show up to their protests and then follow them home when they leave. Then I’m sure they will welcome us entering into their homes and occupying them any time we feel like from here on out. See you soon occupiers! By the way occupiers, go ahead and turn up the thermostat at your houses before I get there because I like to have my living quarters warm enough to walk around in nothing but my underwear all winter long.


Couch surfer
November 18, 2011 at 12:34 PM
Flag this comment

Vacant or occupied (pun intended), private property is private property. Since the defendants think private properties are a free-for-all, they should have no problem with unwanted visitors to their houses.


Shade
November 18, 2011 at 1:09 PM
Flag this comment

Why was the CHPD so heavily armed, you ask? To avoid situations like happened in NYC yesterday, when a NYPD officer was slashed with a piece of broken glass by a member of OWS. Now, que up the apologists for OWS (e.g. it wasn’t one of us, it was an infitrator, etc.)


Rich
November 18, 2011 at 1:11 PM
Flag this comment

If anyone is “overaggressive” in this situation, it’s the protesters. Police in America get a bad rep for trying to protect us, and journalism like this contributes to the problem by making the protesters out to be the victims when the protesters were quite clearly violating the law. These laws are made to protect the same civil rights that allow Occupy participants to be out on the streets, having their voice heard in the first place. Don’t ignore the voice of those who work day in and day out to protect us just because Occupiers happen to spell their beliefs out on neon signs.


Standing on the Sidewalk
November 18, 2011 at 4:43 PM
Flag this comment

@Rich

The pigs who pointed assault riffles at me and other PEACEFUL, UNARMED people, who were not even inside the Chrysler Building, and while we were HANDCUFFED don’t give a SHIT about protecting “us”.

Read more …

Perhaps by “us” you mean Joe Riddle (rich businessman) and the other (rich) business owners of downtown Chapel Hill. The moral of Sunday, Nov. 13 2011 is that the police will only help you if you’re Rich (so I guess you have nothing to worry about).

@all the other haters commenting on this article…
Ya’ll are welcome to occupy my house anytime. I’ll make you dinner, and I won’t even call the SERT team for an armed raid when you wear out your welcome.


CherokeeRemoval
November 18, 2011 at 11:19 PM
Flag this comment

I think these recent events raise serious questions about the priority our society gives private property over other community concerns. As for the CHPD and their response, maybe they should attend the next teach-in on nonviolence.

 
Join the discussion
You Should Know

The Daily Tar Heel reserves the right to remove any comment deemed racially derogatory, inflammatory, or spammatory. Repeat offenders may have their IP address banned from posting future comments. Please be nice.

If this is the first time you've commented, your comment won't appear until you've verified your email address.

Formatting Options:
  • Links: "my link":http://my.url.com
  • Bold: *something!*
  • Italic: _OMG!_
Powered by Detroit Softworks