New ecovillage will be located 10 minutes west of Chapel Hill, pending approval by the county

By Elizabeth Straub
Updated: 01/31/12 12:31am
  Email this article  |      Share on Delicious  Share on Digg
Tools

Erin Hull / DTH
 

Arcadia Cohousing is a pedestrian-oriented residential cohousing community on 16 areas about three miles from the towns of Carrboro and Chapel Hill. “It’s a really great place for kids because its safe… They know everyone so they feel comfortable,” Elisabeth Curtis said. Curtis has lived in the community since it began in 1996.

http://www.cohousing.org/directory/view/3883

Possibly Related

Christian Stalberg is seeking residents to create an ecovillage — a community that would share common land, farm organically, use its own currency and be located about 10 minutes west of Chapel Hill.

Stalberg said he hopes to begin construction on a community that would house up to 100 people on 100 acres of land in the Efland area by the end of the year, after clearing the project with the county.

The community would use little energy, provide affordable housing and make decisions based on general consensus, he said. It would also use environmentally and socially healthy practices to create a sustainable way of life.

“It’s also an effort at replacing the alienation of our common society where you don’t know your neighbor,” he said.

While the community will be new, it is not the area’s first intentional community — a group formed on purpose by people who share common values.

Arcadia Cohousing, a community in Carrboro, was also created by people who agreed to work together toward a common goal.

“Here in our Arcadia community, our focus is around learning how to be a good neighbor and learning to share resources,” said Becky Laskody, an Arcadia resident.

The group that formed Arcadia was created in 1991 and built its community on 16.5 acres in 1994.

Instead of the traditional neighborhood road, a central sidewalk connects houses in Arcadia, leads to a community garden and passes by a common house — complete with kitchen, library, and guest rooms. Some houses are joined and all are located close together.

Stalberg said if approved and built, the ecovillage will contain similar features, including a common house with community resources, and will also raise organic crops and livestock to feed residents.

“We would like the ecovillage to be as food self-sufficient as possible,” he said.

Stalberg said the community would use natural materials and energy-efficient methods to construct homes ranging from 100 to 400 square feet­ .

Arcadia was also designed with the environment in mind, providing access to solar power and protecting the surrounding woods, Laskody said.

“It’s also important for folks to see that there are different ways to create neighborhoods,” she said. “We don’t have to stick with the usual model that developers offer.”

Like the planned ecovillage, Arcadia uses a democratic decision-making process that allows all residents to get involved. While residents may abstain from voting, those who participate in voting must all be in accord for the decision to stand.

Steven Fisher, an Arcadia resident, said he values Arcadia’s respect for privacy and of the individual’s choice to get involved in the decision-making process.

Fisher joined Arcadia because his wife had multiple sclerosis and needed a house to fit her needs.

“I was interested in having the opportunity to design a house that would suit her,” he said.

Elisabeth Curtis, another resident, joined partly to participate in a social experiment — to see if people can live so close to one another.

“If we can’t do it here, what hope is there for the rest of the world?” she said.

Laskody added that living in an intentional community helps develop interdependence.

“Though it takes extra work … you gain a lot from the sharing that you do with other people.”

Contact the City Editor

at city@dailytarheel.com.

Published January 29, 2012 in City

15 comments

Awesome
January 30, 2012 at 10:12 AM
Flag this comment

Good for them. This is what people should be doing, if they are fed up with our tired and corrupt political-economic system and the monopolized forms of production that it supports.


christian stalberg
January 30, 2012 at 12:12 PM
Flag this comment

A couple of clarifications if you please: Firstly, while we will encourage small houses, we do not expect to set a limit at 400 square feet. Secondly, breaking ground on construction before the end of 2012 is extremely ambitious and unlikely. For more information please visit http://carolinacommonwell.org


Curious
January 30, 2012 at 1:04 PM
Flag this comment

Are they really building 100 sq ft houses? How much do they cost to buy? I’ve seen tiny houses in news articles – is this the same idea?


GradStudent
January 30, 2012 at 2:00 PM
Flag this comment

Oh my gosh, this is brilliant. Research has shown that one of the largest drivers of carbon emissions and massive energy consumption are the sizes of our houses. I forget the exact numbers, but houses have more than doubled in size over the past century, and with that increase in size comes an increase in the necessary energy to heat and cool such residences, to say nothing of the materials needed. I congratulate these people on this step and would seriously consider joining a community like it.


Curious
January 30, 2012 at 2:22 PM
Flag this comment

@GradStudent, me too! This sounds incredible! I will definitley do some research on this type of community.


christian stalberg
January 31, 2012 at 8:55 AM
Flag this comment

One manufacturer of ~100 square foot houses is the Tumbleweed Tiny House Company.


UNC Employee
January 31, 2012 at 9:21 AM
Flag this comment

I’d like to hear more about the affordable housing aspect of your plan.


Catherine
January 31, 2012 at 11:35 AM
Flag this comment

I live really close to the area described. Where exactly is the proposed community going to be?


Engineer5
January 31, 2012 at 9:01 PM
Flag this comment

I can’t believe you removed my comment. I’m the token conservative here. I thought this was a place for free expression? Apparently not if one disagrees.

Interesting …


Senna
January 31, 2012 at 10:27 PM
Flag this comment

This will be successful, no doubt.


Shade
February 1, 2012 at 1:45 PM
Flag this comment

There is already plenty of 100 square foot housing in this area. It’s called the dorm rooms. And while some may want to spend their adult lives living like a lemming in a box, I can assure you that a year in HoJo cured me of that. Bring on the 5000 square foot house please.


GradStudent
February 1, 2012 at 2:19 PM
Flag this comment

@Shade

It’s not sustainable to live like that. Who actually needs 5,000 square feet of space? I’m not saying you need to live in a 100sqft box, but what about a 1000? Why is our country (and I say that pointedly) obsessed with living in McMansions?


susan v
February 5, 2012 at 12:15 AM
Flag this comment

When I was in high school in G’boro many years ago, my commercial art instructor Harry Blair asked us to design a city.

I designed one that had a central shopping area, surrounded by a circle meant only for pedestrians and bike/skooters etc. That center circle was surrounded by a set of smaller circle neighborhoods, each composed of multiple income level homes.

Read more …

I believed that if the rich lived among poorer residents they got to know, they would be more likely to share with them and care about those outside their income “circles”.

I also wanted to have different styles of homes – including tree houses – with trees used rather than torn down.
(by the way, it makes me physically ill to see construction that rips up every tree before planting a Lowes or Wal-Mart etc.)

In my plan, each circle neighborhood would have access to parking on the sides away from the center circle and people could of course drive away from the village but not within it.

I wanted to live in a place where I could breathe fresh air, and I believe the health of the residents and the money saved in health care would be worth the efforts.

In 1968 I really didn’t have access to anything that would have given me this idea. It came out of my head and my desire to see a more environmentally safe and socially responsible society.

I got sick working with chemicals, in a publishing company in G’boro and had to move out of the city. It took years of clean air and organic food for me to heal, but I still can’t handle perfumes, pesticide, or bad air. I knew nothing about this illness or that chemical exposures could cause chemical sensitivities when I designed my “city.” I began disable for years and I never was able to share my design or do anything to promote it or make it a reality.

I have heard of some wealthy communities developers trying something similar to this, but, as with many good things, these types of communities are not available to the poor or lower middle class.

It is encouraging to read about these alternative communities, ones in which you don’t have to be rich to enjoy clean air, clean food, and clean energy.

O


Maikwe Ludwig
February 5, 2012 at 9:28 AM
Flag this comment

Hey all! This is a great article, celebrating both cohousing and ecovillages. There are many similar communities around the US, and if you’d like to find out more, there’s a website with a directory of all types of intentional communities: www.ic.org

I’m a member of Dancing Rabbit Ecovillage in Missouri, and I’d love to support your work Christian. Feel free to email me if you’d like some connection with others doing similar stuff: maikwe(at)ecovillageeducation.us

Read more …

While it is indeed true that square footage of housing is one key element in becoming more sustainable, in many ways, the best approach is exactly what Chrisitan is doing: we’re really talking overall, holistic lifestyle shift to make the kind of impact we need. The current estimates are that it will take a 90% reduction in resource use from the current US lifestyle in order to achieve that goal, and ecovillages are some of the only places where we are hitting those numbers. It takes a lot of care, thoughtfulness and consciousness around these issues to do well, and resource sharing (which I’m really glad to see Becky mention) is a critical piece of that. If others are interested, there are consultants, companions and courses that can all help make this work easier.

Thanks, Christian, for your brave, radical and relevant work!


Cat
February 23, 2012 at 5:18 PM
Flag this comment

Re co-housing in this area: Solterra in Durham,NC is a great example!

 
Join the discussion
You Should Know

The Daily Tar Heel reserves the right to remove any comment deemed racially derogatory, inflammatory, or spammatory. Repeat offenders may have their IP address banned from posting future comments. Please be nice.

If this is the first time you've commented, your comment won't appear until you've verified your email address.

Formatting Options:
  • Links: "my link":http://my.url.com
  • Bold: *something!*
  • Italic: _OMG!_
Powered by Detroit Softworks