UNC-system president Thomas Ross said student input needed to come earlier in the tuition process

By Jessica Seaman
Updated: 02/02/12 11:58pm
  Email this article  |      Share on Delicious  Share on Digg
Tools

Josh Clinard / DTH
 

UNC President Tom Ross spoke and answered student questions Wednesday night in Carroll Hall concerning the February 10 Board of Governors meeting to vote on a proposed 8.8 percent tuition increase for 2012-13 and 4.2 percent in 2013-14.

Possibly Related

Student protesters, who have opposed tuition increases since October, will likely have little influence when the UNC-system Board of Governors votes on tuition proposals on Feb. 10.

At a meeting Wednesday night, students pushed UNC-system President Thomas Ross for more representation at board meetings, so they can be more active in the tuition debate.

But Ross said it would be difficult to know if students will influence the board’s decision when they vote in eight days.

Wednesday’s meeting was organized after student groups emailed Ross asking to work with him on tuition increases, said Student Body President Mary Cooper.

“A lot of the movements are showing that students care and want to be engaged,” she said.

Plans for the meeting, which was held on campus in Carroll Hall, were put together hastily and finalized Tuesday evening, Cooper said.

Students at the meeting said they want to have more of a voice in the decision and a vote in Friday’s tuition increase decision.

But Ross said students have had an opportunity to provide their insight on tuition.

“There will be some people on both sides that aren’t happy,” Ross said.

He encouraged students to participate in the tuition discussion by communicating at the campus level and by sending emails to members of the board.

“I don’t know if it will have a difference if they vote,” he said. “But the board is trying hard to make sure students have a voice.”

He said students also have a representative on the board to whom they can relay their concerns.

Atul Bhula, the president of the Association of Student Governments, is the sole non-voting student member of the board.

Students also voiced their opposition to steep tuition hikes that have been proposed by most of the UNC-system campuses.

Ross made his own tuition increase proposal to the board last week, calling for all in-state undergraduate tuition and fee proposals to not exceed a 9.9 percent increase.

Ross’ proposal, if passed by the board at its Feb. 10 meeting, would be $105 less per in-state undergraduate at UNC-CH than what the University proposed, totalling $2.3 million less in overall revenue for the University.

Senior Ana Maria Reichenbach, an international studies major who is also a member of Students for a Democratic Society, said she disagrees with the tuition proposals.

She said many students feel like they are running out of options to get their voices heard by the board.

“I am really mad that this process is shutting out students,” she said. “Students need to come into this situation. (The board) needs to reach out to us.”

Ross said it might be possible to set up an open forum with board members, but students need to take the initiative and contact them first.

“I want to help and be available,” he said.

Laura McCready, a member of the Campus Y’s cabinet, said students need to have a bigger role in the tuition decision.

The system suffered a cut in state funding of 15.6 percent, or $414 million, last year, and some administrators feel the campuses’ needs might only be met through tuition increases.

“It is not going to fill a hole, but we hope to put band aids on the deepest bleeding,” Ross said.

McCready said she is glad Ross took the time to meet with the students.

“It is absurd how little students participate in the process.”

But she said that while she likes Ross’ tuition proposal better than the University’s, his proposed 9.9 percent increase will still hurt many in-state undergraduates.

“We need to think harder about who bears the brunt of the budget cuts,” McCready said.

Contact the State & National Editor at state@dailytarheel.com.

Published February 2, 2012 in UNC-Chapel Hill, Thomas Ross, tuition State

4 comments

Sean Langberg
February 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM
Flag this comment

Dear DTH,

First, proofread your articles for typos.

Read more …

Second, your headline and first paragraph does nothing to help anyone. Demoralizing students by telling them they can’t have an impact. This is what I expect from you, but this is unrepresentative of the meeting and the movement.


STILLTIMEACTUALLY
February 2, 2012 at 9:14 AM
Flag this comment

Despite the absurdly apocalyptic headline used in this article, MANY members of the Board of Governors remain undecided, seeing that they feel obligations to worry about the lower income families in this state where hundreds of dollars of tuition increases would have a devastating impact. The sentiment of inevitability is actually NOT what Tom Ross shared at the meeting, if anything he said frankly he was totally unsure of how the vote would go on February 10th. On top of that this article really needs to highlight and shout from the rooftops the ultimate absurdity: Students are not allowed a single voting member of the Board of Governors, representation many colleges around the nation have. For such a caring guy this is the question that Tom Ross sidestepped the most and where I believe students can have the most impact in their organizing work.

Student ORGANIZERS (Not just protestors, seriously for crying out loud will you look up the definition of a protest? It is a very specific tactic not an amorphous continuous process that encompasses all activity around an issue and the identity of those that participate in said process!!!)

Read more …

Anyways like I was saying Student Organizers are organizing phone banks and additional actions to reach out to the BOG and ask for them not to vote on the plan until the process is more democratic and transparent.

Organizing is never and should never be out of convenience. It is always built in response to an urgent need and maintained by the spirit of resistance. It is not about comfort or whether or not Tom Ross thinks its okay for students to speak out it is the obligation of the students to demand their right to be recognized and listened to in a meaningful capacity.


luke sherry
February 2, 2012 at 10:11 AM
Flag this comment

Months ago, Bruce Carney told Mary Cooper that her tuition proposal, while thoughtful, well-researched, and responsive to student concerns (although it still would have increased tuition significantly) was submitted too late in the process to be considered.

Now, Tom Ross has his own plan. It wasn’t ‘too late’ for Tom Ross, but, unsurprisingly, it is still ‘too late’ for students. This is nothing more than a talking point for administrators that are uncomfortable with student involvement in key university decisions. I do not accept Tom Ross’s (perhaps misrepresented based on the other comments here) fatalism. Students have an obligation to future Tar Heels to stop these tuition hikes. Each percentage that the BOG approves will be compounded over and over again in the future. An increase of 10% this year will forever alter UNC’s ability to provide a quality education at an affordable price.


disappointed
February 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM
Flag this comment

this article is shameful. it misrepresents the meeting and the information presented, and it unnecessarily demoralizes students. i’m embarrassed to have to call the daily tarheel my student newspaper.

 
Join the discussion
You Should Know

The Daily Tar Heel reserves the right to remove any comment deemed racially derogatory, inflammatory, or spammatory. Repeat offenders may have their IP address banned from posting future comments. Please be nice.

If this is the first time you've commented, your comment won't appear until you've verified your email address.

Formatting Options:
  • Links: "my link":http://my.url.com
  • Bold: *something!*
  • Italic: _OMG!_
Powered by Detroit Softworks