Training students for skills that pay

By Ian Lee
Updated: 02/01/12 12:51am
  Email this article  |      Share on Delicious  Share on Digg
Tools

Possibly Related

Working at The Daily Tar Heel, one often hears a great deal about the plight of the modern journalism student. But I was shocked to learn that starting salaries for graduates of the J-School, as they like to call it, are often considerably less than those of plumbers, electricians and mechanics. Despite what we were told in high school, apparently a college degree doesn’t guarantee a higher income.

A little research on the subject provided me some quick answers and led me to a thesis that is likely to ruffle more than a few feathers in South Building: North Carolina’s singular focus on sending students to four-year colleges is hurting our economy and the people of this state.
Despite an unemployment rate of 9.9 percent, North Carolina is in desperate need of blue-collar workers like plumbers, electricians and elevator mechanics.

Though these “middle-skill” jobs certainly require training beyond high school, they don’t require a liberal arts degree from UNC. Instead, our state needs to provide more vocational training through its community colleges.

Employers are looking to fill thousands of these positions but are unable to because of a lack of qualified applicants. To give you an idea of the scope of the problem, more lawyers graduated from UNC School of Law last year than plumbers did from the entire North Carolina community college system.

Middle-skill jobs are not the mundane, low-paying careers many fear, but rather real, viable alternatives for many students in the UNC system. Starting pay often exceeds $50,000 per year. Meanwhile, 12.3 percent of UNC’s 2011 graduates are still seeking employment.

These are the traditional, well-paying middle-class careers that make up 51 percent of North Carolina’s workforce. These jobs built the middle class that helped define America after WWII. And yet only 43 percent of North Carolinians are sufficiently trained to do these jobs.

No, they are not glamorous, but they are critical to our society, and we should value them. Our focus on four-year degrees and white-collar employment has stigmatized traditional blue-collar occupations and is killing the cultural tradition of apprenticeship and training that helped make America great.

North Carolina’s higher education system is perpetuating this gap by failing to meet the middle-skill employment needs of employers while encouraging residents toward careers that require more expensive four-year degrees —a move that often puts students and families in debt.

Enrollment in North Carolina’s four-year institutions is at near-record levels but an excess supply of these graduates is leaving many with difficulty connecting their college skills to those needed by employers.

It’s time North Carolina begins encouraging students to consider all of their education opportunities rather than just those attained from four-year institutions.

A vibrant and strong middle class is in the best interest of all North Carolinians, and it’s time our state begins placing a renewed focus on the technical jobs and skills that will make a vibrant middle-class and state economy possible.

Ian Lee is a Senior business and political science major from Cary. Contact him at ianwlee@live.unc.edu

Published February 1, 2012 in Opinion

10 comments

Ohai
February 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM
Flag this comment

Interesting that you only looked at starting salaries from the J-school… sounds like a coverup to me. What about total lifetime earnings?

One difference between working-class jobs like plumbing and the middle-class jobs J-school grad aim for is that the middle-class jobs increase in salary over time a lot more.


BME
February 1, 2012 at 9:06 AM
Flag this comment
there is a arrgoance problem in this country. esp with the young generation, who think certian jobs are beneath them. they think they are too good for labor jobs. thats why we have millions of illegal immigrants working fields in this country even with 10 percent unemployment. i was in a isreali film class, on the first day the prof asked us to go around the class and talk about yourself and major. everyone said some variation of sex and gender studies except for one other student and myself. i was thinking to myself “ why would you go into 10s of thousands of dollars in debt for a degree that has zero retun on investment?” if your really intrested in sex and gender studies you dont need a degree in it. you can go to the library for free and get all the books on the subject. right now student debt is over 1 trillion dollars. that with all the worthless degrees out there most will not be able to pay back their loans. once again the idiots who made poor decisions will force those who worked hard and made the right chocies in life to pay for their mistakes.


HammerTime
February 1, 2012 at 9:55 AM
Flag this comment

Wow. Entitled much?


Ohai Response
February 1, 2012 at 9:59 AM
Flag this comment

Ohai, you make a good point but according to the College Board reporters have lifetime average earnings of $43,270 compared to $49,870 for plumbers, so it looks like they make more overall, as well as starting. News Correspondents on TV however do make more at near 70k a year.


BLG
February 1, 2012 at 10:51 AM
Flag this comment

People forget entrepreneurship is the backbone of this country. I have a four year liberal arts degree, and I have a decent job within the UNC system. It also took several years of experience for me to get where I am currently (which really isn’t that far). But if I could do it again, I’d go to community college and pick up a trade, and start a business around that skill. This gives you freedom, and control over your own life. You decide how successful you are. If you are a plumber, you can be the next Roto Rooter. That’s totally up to you and how hard you hustle.
Entrepreneurship trumps Corporate every time!
Business Asset > Student Loans


Hans
February 1, 2012 at 11:16 AM
Flag this comment

This is a great point to bring up Ian (and some of the commenters). There is definitely a sense of entitlement within today’s youth and we can’t reform our educational system until we make a shift in how society views the trade jobs like plumbers and electricians. Germany made a substantial investment in improving vocational training in its educational system overhaul and now is one of the few financially stable countries in all of Europe. Until we change our preconceived notions of these jobs, any educational reform is unlikely to make an impact on the national economy.


breal
February 1, 2012 at 1:44 PM
Flag this comment

Ian, great job. I couldn’t have possibly expressed my own thoughts better than the way that you just expressed them. Best column I’ve read all year.

@HammerTime, where’s the sense of entitlement in that letter? That’s just the opposite of what Ian’s saying. He’s saying that there’s a need for people to be practical as well as idealistic when choosing a career path. I agree with him completely. We need to place more emphasis on vocational training. The shrinking of the American middle class is a direct product of the incessant emphasis on the necessity of high-level educational curricula at the expense of the development of real, tangible skills.

Read more …

It’s a downright lie that we tell people when we say that they all need to go to college. I’m glad that I went to college, since my skill set is well suited for the sorts of jobs that a college degree offers. However, there are plenty of people who would be better served in other ways. Allowing the middle class to expand by combining elements of protectionist economics with a revitalization of vocational training in America would help to grow the American middle class once again and bring many out of poverty along the way. There’s no shame in doing what it takes to raise a family in a financially stable manner, regardless of whether or not you get to wear a suit to work. The suggestion that Ian’s notion of the real-world importance of valuable skills involves entitlement in any way is only true in that it supposes that the American worker is entitled to the fruits of his own labor, which can be significant even for those who are not too proud to work blue-collar jobs.

That’s not entitlement, it’s self-sufficiency.


cptobvious
February 1, 2012 at 3:18 PM
Flag this comment

You mean to tell me that everyone in the J-school can’t be a rich and famous news anchor?


John Pershing
February 1, 2012 at 7:10 PM
Flag this comment

Ian Lee is just telling the world what his lyin’ eyes can see. So was Law School Dean Boger when he sent out his mass e-communique to active UNC-CH allumni lawyers and law firms begging them to give errand boy jobs to his newly minted lawyers.


John Pershing
February 1, 2012 at 7:32 PM
Flag this comment

@Ohai Response

“ News Correspondents on TV however do make more at near 70k a year.”

Read more …

News correspondents on TV are a lot like porn stars. They have to “look good” and have stage prescence as well as a big you know what. From therein is derived their compensation premium.

 
Join the discussion
You Should Know

The Daily Tar Heel reserves the right to remove any comment deemed racially derogatory, inflammatory, or spammatory. Repeat offenders may have their IP address banned from posting future comments. Please be nice.

If this is the first time you've commented, your comment won't appear until you've verified your email address.

Formatting Options:
  • Links: "my link":http://my.url.com
  • Bold: *something!*
  • Italic: _OMG!_
Powered by Detroit Softworks