Charlotte City Council ends Occupy encampment

By Amanda Albright
Updated: 01/25/12 3:29pm

After camping out for three months, Occupy Charlotte has been asked to leave.

  Email this article  |      Share on Delicious  Share on Digg
Tools

On The Wire

Latest Entries

On Monday, the Charlotte city council voted nearly unanimously to end the Occupy encampment and was met with outrage from dozens of Occupiers.

“Shame, shame, shame!” protesters chanted when all but one member voted in favor of the ordinance.

John Autry, the only council member to vote against the ordinance, expressed concern about unfair prosecution from police.

Occupy Charlotte protesters spoke out against the ordinance, which bans camping on city property, since its introduction to the city council on Jan. 3.

Occupy Charlotte now has until Jan. 30 to end its encampment in front of Charlotte’s City Hall.

But after the meeting, protesters chanted, “Evict us, we’ll multiply, Occupy will never die.”

Council member Andy Dulin urged protestors to respond peacefully to the ordinance.

“I hope protesters see this council has listened — the ordinance has changed in many ways since Jan. 3,” he said.

The ordinance was created to update city codes for large events, specifically for the Democratic National Convention in September, said City Attorney Bob Hagemann.

In addition to camping, the ordinance bans possession of various items such as chains, backpacks, projectiles, body armor and wire during extraordinary events — large events of national or international significance that will attract a large number of people.

Many Occupy Charlotte members at a Jan. 9 public forum said the ordinance infringes upon free speech rights and could result in profiling and unnecessary searches.

The ordinance also bans any backpack, duffle bag, satchel or cooler with the intent to conceal weapons, and wearing scarves or masks to hide one’s identity while committing a crime.

Autry said before the vote that he was unsure how police officers would determine intent.

Under the amended version of the ordinance, if the suspect proves that the possession of a banned item is for a legitimate reason, there will not be a punishment.

Many city council members said their duty was to protect residents of Charlotte, as well as protect people’s rights.

“Our job is to keep the city safe,” council member Beth Pickering said. “We are weighing the balance between free speech and safety.”

Published January 24, 2012 in On The Wire

On The Wire

Galleries and multimedia
elections_2010

 Elections 2010

The Daily Tar Heel photographers on location for Elections 2010.


1 comment

David
February 8, 2012 at 8:13 AM
Flag this comment

I am extremely impressed together with your writing skills and also with the layout in your weblog. by the way Is this a paid or free web theme ?

Essay Writing

 
Join the discussion
You Should Know

The Daily Tar Heel reserves the right to remove any comment deemed racially derogatory, inflammatory, or spammatory. Repeat offenders may have their IP address banned from posting future comments. Please be nice.

If this is the first time you've commented, your comment won't appear until you've verified your email address.

Formatting Options:
  • Links: "my link":http://my.url.com
  • Bold: *something!*
  • Italic: _OMG!_
Powered by Detroit Softworks