When Playboy's "Girls of the ACC" issue came out this year, people approached me about it constantly. They wanted to know why, as a feminist, I wasn't up in arms about it or, at the very least, making some kind of an issue out of it. And I'll be completely honest with you: I ducked the subject.
I didn't avoid it because I didn't care. I avoided it because I wasn't sure where I stood. I think that my feelings are on par with those of a lot of women my age, and perhaps with those of most women in general.
Pornography, or what constitutes pornography, raises some interesting questions. Where do we draw the line between what is outright degradation and what is erotica? Where do we draw the line in terms of outrageous agendas for political correctness and morality versus the protection of personal liberty and free speech?
Here we have a truly double-edged sword. On one hand, magazines or other media that depict women nude or in sexually explicit situations can be seen as means of empowerment - forums in which women own their sexuality and display themselves without shame.
In fact, we can argue this on behalf of women's liberation. Women are allowed and are allowing themselves to be open about sexuality, whereas we frown upon less progressive areas where women are made to cover up, to remain chaste, to be ashamed of their bodies and to be wary of sex in general.
But these depictions can also represent the imprisonment of women by patriarchal society. The women involved are seen as striving for male attention under false pretenses. Men create these media for a male audience, and women are pawns in the game. They play into the unrealistic standards and expectations that a male-dominated world has created.
Women are not empowering themselves - in fact, they are being subjected because they are only being seen as sexual objects.
Let's face it: Both these arguments are valid.
My feeling is that the discrepancy lies in the situation. Can the latest Playboy centerfold be viewed in the same light as a porn star or as the girl in a 50-cent peep show? Maybe. The argument is there, but it's based on your standards.