The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Wednesday, April 24, 2024 Newsletters Latest print issue

We keep you informed.

Help us keep going. Donate Today.
The Daily Tar Heel

Too tight on the future of tutelage

Like all schools under the NCAA’s keen gaze, UNC takes special care to emphasize the first term in “student athlete.”

And it should, as it’s giving many of its approximately 800 student athletes a subsidized education to play sports.

It’s no secret, though, that many are not fully prepared for the time requirements of balancing work and sports, the academic rigor of UNC, or both.

That is why the University employs tutors to help student athletes with a litany of issues, ranging from the academic to the emotional, and requires student athletes to attend tutoring sessions.

Like any relationship, tutors can’t help athletes as much if the athletes don’t know them, dislike them or are simply scared of accidentally speaking with them outside supervised sessions.
That makes UNC’s new ban on nearly all communication between student athletes and tutors counterproductive.

Under the new rules, they’re prohibited from any sort of electronic communication, like texting, online messaging or emailing. They may only communicate in the Academic Support Center, which closes at 10 p.m.

This is an overreaction to the actions of rogue tutor/mentor Jennifer Wiley, who provided a handful of players impermissible academic and financial benefits.

But instead of preventing further NCAA violations, these rules will just hurt student athletes. Many students do work at odd times or in their rooms. Student athletes are no different.

So when an athlete needs to Facebook chat his or her tutor (who is also up writing a paper) at midnight with questions about how to operate JSTOR, that athlete will now be violating University rules, all for seeking out a better education — or at least a better GPA.

It would make much more sense to let tutors keep doing their jobs to the fullest extent of their abilities, even if UNC would have to allocate extra resources to properly vet them.

This rule is simply the University covering its own back, not looking out for its students when it should have worked to cultivate more compliant and effective tutor-athlete relationships.

UNC was fifth in the number of student athletes on the 2010-11 ACC Academic Honor Roll, with 247. Only seven members of the football team were named, and all joined the team as walk-ons.

Instead of banning communication, the University should look to a review of the Academic Support Program for Student-Athletes published Sept. 1.

The report recommended more clout for the support program in the admissions process, and organizing help by level of academic preparedness instead of by sport, as it is now.

If help was given out based on preparedness instead of team affiliation, it could be more appropriate and focused.

And if the support program had more input on admissions, presumably to increase the academic prowess of the incoming class of athletes, that alone would do far more toward avoiding future academic violations than stopping students from giving or getting help when it’s most needed.

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.