If a tree celebrates Presidents Day in the forest, does it make a sound? And at what point do we care?
I guess it depends if the tree’s of voting age? It’d seem significant if the tree’s potential for civic engagement weren’t limited to a small circle of soil. Or if anyone else were around to be inspired to a newfound respect for the office of president by the oak’s fervent patriotism.
But let’s set trees aside for the moment.
Holidays, like public monuments and the political blogosphere, are stubbornly fixed set-pieces in the ongoing stage production that is our society.
They are prominent, largely unshakeable features of the structure in and through which we go about our lives. Like trees! And like trees, they’re only relatively stable because we’ve stuck them in the ground good and tight, and ignoring them is easier than buying a chainsaw on a college budget.
Unlike trees, however, holidays, statues and buildings named after Ku Klux Klan organizers are man-made. Thus they only really “do things” when we celebrate or regularly attend classes in them.
So what’s a holiday do if it just sits on campus and gets ignored? Does Presidents Day do something to us simply by existing — even though we didn’t get a day off to contemplate its significance and nurse our snow-weekend hangovers?
We’re conscious of it, so that’s something. And a lot of states use it to celebrate just George Washington and Abraham Lincoln’s birthdays, so maybe that specificity mixes things up?
Alabama excludes Lincoln and celebrates Washington and Thomas Jefferson’s birthdays — even though the latter isn’t until April. Presumably because that other president presided over one of the greatest periods of death and violence in American history?