“I am really looking forward to implementing the changes and publicizing those to the University community so that the community as a whole can really support the court and just making sure everyone knows what the changes are and what’s going on,” Foard said.
Nathan Tilley , current chairman of the Honor Court, said the changes are not meant to affect the standards of the process but to include community members.
“Having faculty members on the hearing process won’t essentially change the divergence of decisions, but it will enable more communities to get a sense of how things work,” he said.
For initial cases of academic dishonesty, new sanctioning guidelines establish a minimum sanction of a failing grade in the course, an aspect of the course or on an assignment and a written letter of warning. It includes a table elaborating on relevant factors in the sanction for consistency purposes.
“The new changes to the sanctions will be a good reflection on the way the court has thought about it for a long time, even it’s not in such explicit terms,” Tilley said.
“The sanction, instead of being an overall broad sanction for all academic violations, tailors to different types of violations.”
The court will offer staff training in April and August and is working on rewriting manuals.
Current Attorney General Anna Sturkey said the new leaders will face challenges, such as offering their staffs training and publicizing the changes.
Her biggest recommendation for Dominguez is to have a group of people who can support her.
“I really felt like this year was all about making the honor system a partnership between students, faculty and administrators, so continuing to listen to them and listen to their advice,” Sturkey said.