The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Thursday, March 28, 2024 Newsletters Latest print issue

We keep you informed.

Help us keep going. Donate Today.
The Daily Tar Heel

Column: ‘Serial’ picks a narrow brush

Seth Rose is a senior political science major from Durham.

Seth Rose is a senior political science major from Durham.

We are living in an important time when the justice system is beginning to be publicly scrutinized. At stake are questions of race, class and innocence.

In search of a means by which to further my understanding of these issues, I started listening to the podcast “Serial,” a spinoff of the popular radio program “This American Life.”

If you’re not already hip to “Serial,” let me save you from Wikipedia spoilers. Sarah Koenig — the lead journalist, voice and cult hero behind “Serial” — is reinvestigating the 1999 murder of Hae Min Lee, a high school student, in Baltimore County, Md. Adnan Syed, Lee’s ex-boyfriend, was convicted despite a lack of physical evidence and is serving a life sentence.

During its first season, Serial obtained widespread critical acclaim, as well as a massive following — the 12 episodes averaged 3.4 million downloads each when it concluded in December. Koenig combined a nose for dramatic storytelling with an obsessive attention to detail and a convenient podcast format. She should be commended for exploring and challenging her own biases in the case.

But ultimately, I felt profoundly let down by the podcast’s narrative decisions. Koenig was so intently focused on the who-dun-it format of teasing out the perpetrator of the murder, that broader questions of the justice system were rarely — and even then, only passingly — addressed.

For example, Koenig regularly ruminates about whether someone as charming as Syed could commit a heinous murder, but never once questions whether a 17-year-old boy should be allowed to be given a life sentence, as he was.

She quickly dismisses Syed’s mother’s contention that racial bias played a major role in jury deliberations. One could listen to the combined eight-and-a-half-hour duration of a podcast all about a crime in America and learn very little about crime in America.

This is especially disappointing in juxtaposition to the conversation forming around the grand jury decisions in the killings of Eric Garner and Michael Brown.

Studied in isolation, it could be argued that these cases were not reflective of racism in the justice system. But people are not enraged just because of these individual events. They are enraged because these cases confirmed the broader truth that this nation systematically devalues black lives.

Any story told about the events in Ferguson, Mo., must tell this full truth. “Serial” had the same responsibility with the justice system, but it failed to do so sufficiently.

In an interview with MotherJones, Koenig offered this as explanation for the resonance of the show: “Because it’s about the basics: Love and death and justice and truth. All these big, big things.”

“Serial” explained a case where American racism, juvenile detention and the incarceration of innocent people are tangential realities. As such, it was hardly a story about justice, or truth, at all.

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.