“I have no intent to exercise my authority to promulgate any guidelines or regulations that require transgender students to use the restrooms consistent with their biological sex,” UNC-system President Margaret Spellings said in an affidavit.
Spellings’ statement regarding this non-enforcement was filed in a motion asking a federal court to stay legal proceedings against the university system while a higher court decides a separate case from Virginia, which involves a transgender student suing a county school board over a policy prohibiting him from using the boy’s restroom.
UNC Board of Governors member Marty Kotis said the board is hopeful pending legal action against the University will be dropped altogether because the system has never taken a position in support of enforcement of HB2.
“The legal pressure we’ve faced is certainly unfortunate — the position of the University has always been that we do not discriminate against our students based on any criterion,” Kotis said, “We have not changed any of our nondiscrimination policies.”
But critics of the Board of Governors and President Spellings point to inconsistencies in the way HB2 and transgendered students’ concerns have been considered.
“This most recent decision is completely at odds with orders issued by President Spellings which were effectively UNC’s own version of ‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell’. Transgendered students have been made to feel uncomfortable and unwelcome,” said Courtney Sams, president of UNC Young Democrats.
“Now that there’s pending legal action, Spellings and the BOG are suddenly becoming enlightened to what should have been their position from the beginning,” said Sams. “I’m glad they’ve taken the stance they have, but I would not say it’s particularly praiseworthy to decide to follow your own nondiscrimination ordinances.”
The UNC College Republicans have declined to take an official position on the system’s decision.