The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Thursday, April 25, 2024 Newsletters Latest print issue

We keep you informed.

Help us keep going. Donate Today.
The Daily Tar Heel

Column: The market and its discontents

claude smiling.JPG

During the earlier part of the 20th century, an “Economic Calculation Debate” took place between economists; one side argued for a centrally planned socialist economy, the other for a laissez-faire capitalist one. 

In this debate, Friedrich Hayek asserted that a planned economy would always be inefficient when compared to the free market because information is dispersed throughout society, and thus requires a decentralized economy in order to function efficiently. A centralized economy, which is managed by a limited number of people, possesses limited information.

Decentralized economic planning, by this understanding, would still be able to function in a society with dispersed knowledge the same way that a decentralized free market economy would. Beyond this, Hayek’s criticisms of centralized economic planning only hold true on the micro-level. 

We find that in many cases where we lack complete information we can still make highly accurate general forecasts — we might not be able to predict the weather perfectly on any given day, but we can easily predict average temperature over the course of the next decade. 

Since Hayek first made this argument in 1945, there have been over six decades of advancements in computer sciences and cybernetics, which allow us to gather, transmit and process information at unbelievable speeds.

Even within a capitalist market economy, massive corporations like Walmart and Amazon, which resemble national governments in size and entire countries in terms of economic output, use a form of centralized economic planning to allocate and distribute resources and supplies among its many subdivisions. 

In defense of the market, some argue that the competition it enables is necessary for the technological innovation and luxuries, like the iPhone or the Banana Slicer. 

But in terms of the innovation that the free market supposedly enables, the main driver of technological advancement in the United States has been the federal government, which funds more than 50 percent of all research and development in the country. 

Private foundations account for only 6 percent. Technology like microprocessors, hard drives, lithium batteries, cellular networks, GPS, touchscreens and the Internet were all developed through federal funding.

Taking all of this into account, an alternative to market capitalism is feasible. Broadly, it could resemble a modernized version of the anarcho-syndicalist economy in place in Catalonia during the Spanish Civil War, as described by Diego Abad de Santillan in his book After the Revolution — a federated economic structure which can use cybernetics for broad economic planning to coordinate resources on a larger scale and decentralized, democratically managed workers’ councils to address the needs of local communities, while supporting research and development to develop automation and further improve economic planning. 

If we want to improve the conditions of society, we should not limit ourselves to what is, but rather consider what could potentially be.

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.