The installment of an independent commission would take the General Assembly, which currently draws the congressional and state House and Senate maps, further away from the process. However, the legislature would still have to approve the map the independent commission drew before it could be put into action.
“One of the criteria we definitely want to have in place is that they keep in mind continuity, they keep in mind commonalities, make sure that it follows the present constitution, that it will take no political consideration or incumbencies in consideration whatsoever,” said Reives.
Mitch Kokai, senior political analyst at the John Locke Foundation, said counties should not be split more than they absolutely have to, and those drawing voting districts should not factor in voter registration, voting histories of past districts or the residencies of incumbents. Kokai said the John Locke Foundation supports nonpartisan maps but is not taking a stance on a particular piece of legislation.
“Since North Carolina became a competitive two-party state, which goes back to the '70s, the party in power has used the redistricting process to try to extend its power and to disadvantage the other party,” he said.
Kokai said action for gerrymandering has been happening frequently since the 1990s.
“I wouldn’t place any bets on it passing, but I do think it has a much stronger chance this time around than it has in other recent years,” he said.
After the 2018 midterm elections, Republicans lost their supermajority and have fewer seats in the N.C. House and the Senate. The party with more representatives can have a bigger influence on the map, so Kokai said this shift in power could cause the Republicans to lose some control over drawing the maps. Because of this, he said they may be less inclined to disadvantage the Democrats now.
“At a point where neither party is sure who will be doing the redistricting, the idea, the hope is, that they’ll opt for nonpartisan redistricting as opposed to taking the chance that the other party would do it,” said McGrady.
McGrady said instead of waiting to allow the courts to decide how to draw the lines, the party should opt to draw a nonpartisan map on their own. He said he would announce another bipartisan piece of legislation in about a week.
“There are many ways to move towards nonpartisan redistricting and an openness to looking at different ways of doing the same thing,” he said.
This bill would propose keeping redistricting in the hands of the legislature but providing more criteria for the drafters of the bill, he said.
“We could really take this opportunity and completely change the narrative about redistricting and completely change the narrative about our state,” said Reives.