She also said the effects of the power plant on residents of Carrboro is linked to racial inequities.
“This is also an environmental justice concern as historically Black communities, such as Pine Knolls and Northside, which are located in Chapel Hill, are impacted directly by the plant, per the results of an EPA’s environmental justice screen poll that was created to identify these injustices,” she said.
Lee said 10 years ago, former Chancellor Holden Thorpe said the plant would be shut down by 2020. However, in 2017, the administration went back on this decision and said they were working toward having a carbon neutral campus by the year 2050.
“We all know that that is an inadequate response to both the climate and public health threat that this plant poses," she said.
Gary Richards, another resident of Carrboro, has been conducting protests in front of the coal plant every Friday morning for almost nine months in an effort to encourage community members to take a stand.
“So this is a very personal issue for me," he said. "In light of the article in The Daily Tar Heel that UNC clearly has no intention of closing the plant, it's up to the rest of us, the people of Carrboro and the people of Chapel Hill, all of us to do what’s necessary.”
Richards said he agreed with Lee that this is an equity issue that needs to be changed.
“I think this is very clearly an environmental justice issue. It was no accident why that plant was built where it was, it was clearly in communities of vulnerable and less affluent people, and it is time to end it,” he said.
While both Lee and Richards spoke in favor of the resolution urging UNC to shut down the power plant, not all residents of Carrboro agree with them.
Terri Buckner, a Carrboro resident and OWASA board member, said while she does agree that sustainability and the environment are important issues, she said she believes shutting down UNC’s power plant would cause more problems than it would solve.
“Let's think about the long view," she said. "What happens if the plant closes? Then the University has to rely on Duke Power more exclusively, which means that we will be using bad coal that puts pollution into other communities, and that is a social justice issue also."
Buckner also pointed out that the cogeneration power plant at UNC is not a typical coal-incinerator like the one at Duke, but is actually more energy-efficient and cleaner.
She said ultimately this decision lies within the leadership of the University, and leaders who value sustainability should be able to solve the problem.
@DTHCityState | firstname.lastname@example.org