• Campus
    • Campus
    • Student Life
    • Administration
    • Faculty
    • Higher Education
  • City & County
    • City & County
    • Chapel Hill
    • Carrboro
    • Education
    • Public Safety
  • Politics
    • Politics
    • North Carolina
    • National
  • Sports
    • Sports
    • Football
    • Men's Basketball
    • Women's Basketball
    • Cross Country
    • Golf
    • Men's Soccer
    • Women's Soccer
    • Swimming and Diving
    • Men's Tennis
    • Women's Tennis
    • Field Hockey
    • Rowing
    • Volleyball
  • Culture
    • Culture
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • Food
  • Opinion
    • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Cartoons
    • Columns
    • Letters
    • Kvetching Board
  • Multimedia
    • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Galleries
    • Audio
  • About
    • About
    • Hiring
    • Board of Directors
    • Alumni
    • Corrections
    • Contact
    • Meet the editors
    • Policies & Bylaws
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Policies
    • Events Calendar
    • Celebrations
    • Obituaries
  • Donate
  • Story Collections

  • HeelsHousing
  • Offline Chapel Hill
  • Shop
  • Buy Photos
  • 1893 Brand Studio
  • Alumni
  • Events Calendar
  • Celebrations/Obits
    • Celebrations
    • Obituaries
  • Southern Neighbor
  • Newsletter
  • Classifieds
  • Campus
  • City & County
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Culture
  • Opinion
  • Donate
  • HeelsHousing
  • Search
The Daily Tar Heel

Serving the students and the University community since 1893.

The Daily Tar Heel
    • Campus
      • Campus
      • Student Life
      • Administration
      • Faculty
      • Higher Education
    • City & County
      • City & County
      • Chapel Hill
      • Carrboro
      • Education
      • Public Safety
    • Politics
      • Politics
      • North Carolina
      • National
    • Sports
      • Sports
      • Football
      • Men's Basketball
      • Women's Basketball
      • Cross Country
      • Golf
      • Men's Soccer
      • Women's Soccer
      • Swimming and Diving
      • Men's Tennis
      • Women's Tennis
      • Field Hockey
      • Rowing
      • Volleyball
    • Culture
      • Culture
      • Arts & Entertainment
      • Food
    • Opinion
      • Opinion
      • Editorials
      • Cartoons
      • Columns
      • Letters
      • Kvetching Board
    • Multimedia
      • Multimedia
      • Video
      • Galleries
      • Audio
    • About
      • About
      • Hiring
      • Board of Directors
      • Alumni
      • Corrections
      • Contact
      • Meet the editors
      • Policies & Bylaws
    • Advertise
      • Advertise
      • Policies
      • Events Calendar
      • Celebrations
      • Obituaries
    • Donate
    • Story Collections

    • HeelsHousing
    • Offline Chapel Hill
    • Shop
    • Buy Photos
    • 1893 Brand Studio
    • Alumni
    • Events Calendar
    • Celebrations/Obits
      • Celebrations
      • Obituaries
    • Southern Neighbor
    • Newsletter
    • Classifieds
  • In the News
  • The Daily Tar Heel Election Center
  • The OC Report
  • Football
  • 2020 Coronavirus Outbreak
  • Men's basketball

10/15/2020, 9:11pm

Federal court ruling requires witness signature on absentee ballots in North Carolina

Federal court ruling requires witness signature on absentee ballots in North Carolina Buy Photos
There were two socially-distanced lines at early voting, one to turn in signed absentee ballots and one for people to vote the standard way.

Share

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Mail
  • Print
BY Trevor Moore

A federal ruling Wednesday requires all absentee ballots in North Carolina to have a witness signature even if the voter separately confirms their vote.

The order changes a previous guideline set by the North Carolina State Board of Elections on Sept. 22 that could be used to circumvent the witness requirement for absentee ballots. The ruling was made by Judge William Osteen Jr. in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, who has overseen many other election rulings so far this year. 

What happened

The guidelines say that voters with mistakes on their absentee ballots can go through a curing process. Before this ruling, if a ballot was missing a witness signature, voters could fill out a separate form to correct the mistake before Election Day. The certification could then be signed by the voter without the need of a witness. 

This was part of what prompted former board members David Black and Ken Raymond to resign on Sept. 23.


Editors Picks

Chill on the Hill: Running with Reason


Editorial: UNC's pass/fail failures


Orange County Arts Commission inducts two new members into advisory board



But now, if a witness signature is missing or invalid, the voter has to send in a completely new ballot.

One of the cases associated with the decision is being defended in part by the Southern Coalition for Social Justice. Mitchell Brown, who works for the SCSJ, said that ballot curing was more important this year because of the pandemic.

“If you’ve voted in person your whole entire life and then all of a sudden you have to go through a whole different process to vote by mail, you’re bound to make mistakes,” Brown said. “You didn’t put your address on the ballot, you didn’t sign the ballot or various other simple fixes.”

The Wednesday federal ruling began with a Sept. 26 request from plaintiffs, including N.C. House Speaker Rep. Tim Moore, R-Cleveland, and N.C. Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger, R-Rockingham, for a restraining order on curing absentee ballots that lack a witness signature. 

The plaintiffs stated they made the request because they believe state legislatures should govern elections, not other parties. 

“As North Carolina’s ‘Legislature,’ the General Assembly is tasked with regulating federal elections in North Carolina,” the request stated. 

The request claimed that the N.C. State Board of Elections attempted to assert emergency powers unlawfully when making the Sept. 22 update to the ballot cure process guidelines.

In response to this request, on Oct. 1, the N.C. Board of Elections requested that county boards of elections stop processing absentee ballots with a missing witness signature, holding some voters' ballots in limbo. 

What the ruling means

Wednesday’s order now requires voters with a missing witness signature on their ballot to send in a completely new ballot or vote using a different method. Osteen ruled that smaller fixes, such as an incomplete witness address or a witness signature in the wrong place, could still be cured using a cure certification.

Brown said prior to the Aug. 21 ballot curing guidelines set by the N.C. State Board of Elections, North Carolina did not have a uniform ballot curing process.

“Some counties would throw it away, some counties would keep it and help you fix it, but it wasn’t uniform,” he said. “I think that, at a base level, that’s what we’re trying to get after. That there needs to be a uniform cure process from the State Board.”

Theodore Shaw, a law professor at UNC and member of the National Task Force on Election Crises, said people should be given the opportunity to correct benign violations.

“Many people believe that this election is going to be extremely close, as have been some of the recent elections, both in presidential election years but also 2018,” Shaw said. “When you have these close races, the old (saying) that every vote counts is really proven.”

As of Oct. 15, more than 500,000 absentee ballots have been cast in North Carolina. 

Registered voters in North Carolina can request an absentee ballot until Oct. 27. For those who don't want to vote by mail, early voting sites in North Carolina are open from Oct. 15 through Oct. 31. Voters will also be able to vote in person on Election Day, Nov. 3. 

To read more of The Daily Tar Heel's election coverage, visit our election center.

@trevorwmoore

@DTHCityState | city@dailytarheel.com 


Next up in City & County

  • Former Vice President Joe Biden projected to win U.S. presidency in close race

  • Black Lives Matter flags remain at Carrboro Town Hall despite removal request

  • Push for outdoor seating on Franklin Street raises questions about accessibility


Next up in The OC Report

  • Former Vice President Joe Biden projected to win U.S. presidency in close race

  • Black Lives Matter flags remain at Carrboro Town Hall despite removal request

  • Push for outdoor seating on Franklin Street raises questions about accessibility


Next up in North Carolina Politics

  • Former Vice President Joe Biden projected to win U.S. presidency in close race

  • Tillis declares narrow victory, dispelling predictions of N.C. flipping U.S. Senate

  • Republicans keep their control over N.C. General Assembly


Next up in The Daily Tar Heel Election Center

  • Former Vice President Joe Biden projected to win U.S. presidency in close race

  • Black Lives Matter flags remain at Carrboro Town Hall despite removal request

  • How influential are influencers? Political science professors explain


The Daily Tar Heel welcomes thoughtful discussion on all of our stories, but please keep comments civil and on-topic.

Latest Print Edition

Print Edition Print Archive

One Vote N.C. Voter Guide

Special Print Edition

Games & Horoscopes

Print Edition Games Archive

Start the Presses!

Thank you for reading! You are someone who appreciates independent student journalism, support that work with your tax-deductible donation today!

Donate Now!
    • Front Page
    • Campus
    • City & County
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Culture
    • Opinion
    • Donate
    • HeelsHousing
Daily Tar Heel To Homepage
109 E. Franklin St. Suite 210, Chapel Hill, NC 27514
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Shop
  • Buy Photos
  • 1893 Brand Studio
  • Alumni
  • Events Calendar
  • Celebrations/Obituaries
  • Southern Neighbor
  • Offline Chapel Hill
  • Newsletter
  • RSS
  • Classifieds

All Rights Reserved

© Copyright 2020 The Daily Tar Heel

Powered by Solutions by The State News.