The Daily Tar Heel

Serving the students and the University community since 1893

Sunday September 26th

Editorial: How should Greek Life move forward?

<p>UNC’s Pi Lambda Phi on West Cameron Avenue is, like other fraternities, technically considered a commercial structure in Chapel Hill, making it subject to the same fire codes as businesses.</p>
Buy Photos UNC’s Pi Lambda Phi on West Cameron Avenue photographed March 2, 2019.

The Editorial Board has outlined the many problems plaguing Greek organizations at UNC and across the nation: classism, racism and sexual assault are among the most severe of these issues. 

At the same time, fraternities and sororities have been around since universities themselves were founded. It seems impossible to uproot the complex systems that make up UNC’s Greek system.

When we seek to reform Greek life, we must look at the good, the bad and the ugly. Reconciling the social benefits with the undeniable harm is necessary to bring change to the Greek system.

To start, the roots of Greek life are difficult to untangle from our universities. Fraternities were originally created as secret societies that were disapproved of by university administrations. Over time, this relationship became more symbiotic. Colleges rely on Greek alumni for donations, which gives the administration little incentive to reign in fraternities and sororities, whose powers go largely unchecked.

Greek life also saves colleges money. One in eight American students at four-year institutions lives in Greek housing, an alternative to on-campus dorms. Greek houses across the country are estimated to be worth $3 billion a housing expense that could have fallen on the shoulders of universities.

Additionally, fraternities and sororities are often situated as centers of social engagement on campus. Universities may boast to incoming students about the tremendous opportunities within the Greek system. Thus, Greek culture becomes campus culture, boosting the University’s legacy and reputation. 

The decentralized structure of fraternity and sorority governance also makes it difficult for members to be held accountable. The University has little jurisdiction over the constitutions or bylaws that dictate member behavior. Furthermore, because many Greek houses are privately owned, campus police have limited access to what happens behind closed doors.

There are also significant social costs to pushing Greek life off college campuses. In many ways, fraternities and sororities are no different than other clubs on campus — they provide networking and leadership opportunities for members and take on philanthropic causes to support. 

Condemning the Greek life system without examining the ways in which sororities can serve as safe spaces for their members of marginalized groups (such as LGBTQ, members of religious minorities or members of racial and ethnic minorities) can be problematic. Despite being primarily white and straight organizations, members of marginalized communities involved in Greek life may find solace and safety with others in their Greek organization who share their same identity. Multiple Greek organizations affiliated with the National Pan-Hellenic Council and Multicultural Greek Council have roots in serving marginalized members. 

UNC itself is home to eight historically African American Greek organizations. These groups can be places for marginalized students to benefit from the support and community of Greek life, despite being within a predominantly white Greek system and University.

It is worth mentioning that members of Greek life are increasingly calling to dismantle the system themselves. Duke University's Zeta Tau Alpha and Alpha Delta Pi both moved to disband their chapters this past year, and although the motion wasn’t passed, the effort was notable. As members of Greek life recognize fundamental pitfalls between its impact and claimed ideology, sorority and fraternity members are battling with the same questions non-members are: what is the true impact of Greek life? Ultimately, Greek life members' efforts to abolish or reform their chapters expose that many aren’t blind to the issues facing their organizations.

The same Greek communities from which problems arise are equipped with the tools to dismantle them. 

Many Greek organizations claim to be changing their policies, language and practices to be more inclusive. However, change needs to be concrete and sustainable on a national level for all Panhellenic and Interfraternity council organizations to be effective. This change cannot be done without genuine work from sorority and fraternity members themselves.

As it stands now, Greek life is at a crossroads: to disband, reform or stay the same. It is very unlikely that the system will be disbanded due to its historical and economic influence on our schools. But if genuine reform isn’t pursued and implemented by Greek members, as well as their national counterparts, Greek organizations cannot truly be the promoters of “growth”, “intellect” and “sister/brotherhood,” as they claim. Fundamental alteration of the Greek system is not only necessary for members and non-members — it’s necessary for the organizations themselves to maintain their claimed values.

There is undeniable potential for good from organizations that espouse community and philanthropy. However, it is up to the members of those organizations, and the universities that house them, to fulfill that potential. Otherwise, as we’ve seen both historically and alarmingly recently, the consequences can be undeniably destructive.

@dthopinion

opinion@dailytarheel.com

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.



Comments

Welcome Back Edition 2021

Special Print Edition

Games & Horoscopes

Print Edition Games Archive