The Daily Tar Heel

Serving the students and the University community since 1893

Monday January 24th

Editorial: UNC's lack of leadership isn't new, but it's still unacceptable

The front entrance to South Building is pictured on Thursday, Jan. 6, 2022.
Buy Photos The front entrance to South Building is pictured on Thursday, Jan. 6, 2022.

The omicron variant poses a variety of risks to people who may become infected — such as transmission to community members and individual illness. It’s up to institutions to make informed decisions to protect not only their students, but their employees and staff.

This is a responsibility we haven’t seen UNC take on.

Effective health communication has been proven to be a key factor in the COVID-19 pandemic. Being able to identify when cases are spiking, tracing close contacts to prevent further transmission and communicating effectively to the community is the responsible first step that UNC must commit to.

Current research shows that the omicron variant is highly contagious, affects both vaccinated and unvaccinated groups — and is spreading rapidly. To mitigate this, the University must consistently test and report COVID-19 cases as they arise on campus, and complete contact tracing to prevent clusters from spiraling.

While UNC did require a test for on-campus residents before arrival, that was the end of their efforts. On Jan. 5, before most students returned to campus, there was a significant spike in cases — one of the highest single-day totals UNC has seen since fall 2020.

And instead of making a public notification, the University promptly removed its COVID-19 dashboard from view, pausing its updates until Jan. 10.

Additionally, cluster reporting has changed since the fall of 2020 to follow NCDHHS definition. By this new definition, a cluster is five or more COVID-19 cases with plausible epidemiological linkages — cases that were present in the same setting during the same time period, where the timing fits with the timing of likely exposure and where no other sources of likely exposure are considered.

In previous semesters, a cluster was reported when there were five or more cases that were deemed in proximal location. But by only requiring cases with epidemiological linkages be reported, it leaves individuals that test positive and aren’t linked to avoid being accounted for in public cluster notifications.

This, in turn, leaves multiple cases going under the radar of the local community — and leaves it up to the person infected (likely a busy college student), to complete their own contact tracing. It prevents the number of cluster notifications from spiraling, but puts the health of UNC students and the local community at risk.

Logically, given the spike that we've already seen this month, UNC should follow suit with other elite universities and offer courses in a virtual format for the initial weeks of the semester. Instead, the administration delegated this authority to deans, who can then give professors their own discretion to move the format of their course delivery. This not only puts pressure on individual staff members, but reveals a lack of leadership from higher administration.

We’ve seen it before — the lack of leadership to condemn racism and discrimination on campus, the lack of leadership to offer attendance flexibility during a global pandemic and the lack of leadership to mandate a COVID-19 vaccine.

The lack of transparency isn’t new — but it remains unacceptable.

@dthopinion

opinion@dailytarheel.com

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.



Comments

The Daily Tar Heel for December 1, 2021

Special Print Edition

Games & Horoscopes

Print Edition Games Archive