“It would be nice to go six months without experiencing some major historical event,” one of my Daily Tar Heel coworkers said at a recent Editorial Board meeting.
We shared a brusk laugh. None of us could remember the last time we opened a news app and didn’t feel our stomachs churn, anxiously awaiting headlines about how another global catastrophe had struck.
Fast forward to Feb. 24 — the international community watched in horror as Russia invaded Ukraine, forcing millions to flee their homes for safety. Once again, the world held its breath in shared trepidation.
“It’s been a very rough few weeks,” said Professor Graeme Robertson, director of the Center for Slavic, Eurasian and East European Studies at UNC. He spoke about how UNC professors are navigating dialogue about the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine, and what actions we can collectively take to spread awareness.
Professor Robertson emphasized how social media has made access to news “much more immediate.”
Inevitably, an abundance of information poses both a blessing and a curse. In 2009, the American Academy of Pediatrics found that consistent exposure to graphic or distressing news can contribute to emotional desensitization to violence. Though my generation may be more informed than its predecessors, we are oftentimes numb to struggles that do not directly affect us.
This conversation made me reflect upon my own social media usage. I often tend to swipe away the CNN notifications that pop up on my phone instead of reading them, or scroll through one of many TikToks explaining recent events.
I know I am not the first — nor last — to say that it is an immense privilege to choose when I consume news based on personal convenience, rather than experience its subject matter firsthand.
In the age of information, it has never been so easy to overlook conflicts the media has already covered in seeming abundance and instead focus on the new, oftentimes sensationalized, events which emerge. This harmful tradeoff should not exist.
“My worry is that people will get bored. Please don’t get bored,” Robertson said toward the end of our call. These words serve as a poignant reminder that we, as a community, have an obligation to not only raise awareness for this crisis, but sustain it.
So, what can we do?
UNC Professor Michael Morgan, who teaches courses on the Cold War, modern international history and the history of human rights recommends that students educate themselves about Ukraine.
“You could start, for example, with Serhii Plokhy's or Timothy Snyder’s books,” he wrote in an email.
In academic settings, it is imperative that both students and educators discuss the Russia-Ukraine conflict with careful consideration for others’ lived experiences. Robertson warns against falling for simple binaries, such as “Ukraine good-Russia bad.”
We must instead acknowledge that millions of Russians oppose the war. The problem is they live in an oppressive regime, where protesting the government yields grave consequences.
Most importantly, we should augment Ukrainian voices who have a direct connection to the conflict, as well as be sincere in our efforts to engage with family and friends as we navigate these distressing times.
If you’re able, please consider donating to the charities that are responding to the humanitarian catastrophe. You can also reach out to your representatives in Congress and urge them to take action.
To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.