The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Thursday, Feb. 29, 2024 Newsletters Latest print issue

We keep you informed.

Help us keep going. Donate Today.
The Daily Tar Heel

Column: Leave TikTok researchers to their devices

0126_Paul_opinion-banning-apps-educational-implications-2.JPG
DTH Photo Illustration. Banning social media apps, such as TikTok, could create challenges for academia.

Earlier this year, Gov. Roy Cooper signed Executive Order No. 276, prohibiting the use of certain applications, including TikTok, on state devices. The executive order led to the development of a new policy from the North Carolina Department of Information Technology, which bans TikTok on state-owned and state-issued devices. While the policy does not apply to UNC or community colleges in North Carolina, it remains to be seen whether TikTok is in the clear at these schools. 

“Consistent with Governor Cooper’s Executive Order 276, the University is currently working with the System Office to review the security concerns TikTok may pose to our network systems. We will follow guidance from the System on any ban or suspension of TikTok or WeChat,” a spokesperson for UNC told The Daily Tar Heel. 

At a research institution like UNC, any university-wide ban or suspension of TikTok would have adverse implications for research and academia. 

In the case a ban is implemented on campus, it most likely will only prohibit TikTok on state-proprietary phones and computers. A more extreme interpretation may entail the app being inaccessible via campus Wi-Fi networks, as some public universities have done already.    

While it looks improbable that a ban would come to UNC, it should not be dismissed as an entirely far-fetched possibility. So far, there has been a litany of public universities that have adopted restrictive policies regarding TikTok, following state-level decisions to ban the app. 

Restrictions would make studies that rely on TikTok data much harder than they already are. For scholars like Deen Freelon, a principal researcher at UNC’s Center for Information, Technology, and Public Life, TikTok is already enemy No. 1 when it comes to accessibility. According to Freelon, who has developed a scraping tool called Pyktok to pull data from the platform, TikTok itself presents the biggest challenge to researchers. 

“The way they (TikTok) represent data constantly changes. And when it changes, that means that the techniques that I've used (for Pyktok) to access it break," Freelon said. "Sometimes what they have changed it to becomes prohibitively difficult to access on an automated basis. And so some of the earlier functionality that my program (Pyktok) had, it doesn't have anymore." 

This problem is not unique to Freelon’s research. He is part of a larger community and ongoing discussion about how to acquire TikTok data in the absence of alternatives from the company. 

“I'm in conversation with other folks, and they can't figure it out, either," he said. "So, ultimately, we have to rely on TikTok’s technical architecture, sort of playing ball with us, and allowing us to access it on an automated basis. And they could turn off that functionality anytime, and they have done that in certain aspects.”

In addition to being unpredictable about how it represents its data, TikTok is behind its peers in making data available to researchers. Twitter currently delivers an academic API that is free for graduate students and faculty at accredited institutions, and Meta allows downloading content across Facebook, Instagram and Reddit via its tool CrowdTangle. However, if TikTok does ever follow through with plans to launch a public research API, researchers would be able to tap into a goldmine of insights on today’s most current and disruptive platform. 

In the wake of restrictive action across state institutions against TikTok, academics are flagging concerns over its limitations on teaching, outreach and research, and are advocating for exemptions in higher education. Blanket bans like the ones we are seeing fail to consider how they make important research inaccessible. At an institution like UNC, limiting access to platforms like TikTok would effectively curb the cutting-edge research that is done, such as the recent pioneering study on social media and adolescent brain development. 

More broadly, if public campuses are the only ones seeing these bans, this creates a divide between public and private higher education, as private institutions are insulated from directives that only affect state entities. 

While it is possible that they may pass their own bans, Freelon noted that faculty at private universities have the latitude to advocate for themselves in ways that public institutions’ faculty may not. 

“It may be a situation where a lot of the best research out of this ends up coming out of private organizations,” he said. 

Perhaps these bans present an opportunity to examine what happens to states and their institutions when an app like TikTok becomes prohibitively limited. But, the concerns raised by researchers have made the next steps imperative: states must critically evaluate the actual risks of social media platforms, mitigate those risks to protect users and safeguard academic freedom as more than an afterthought.

@dthopinion

opinion@dailytarheel.com

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.


Le Ha

Le Ha is the 2023-24 opinion editor at The Daily Tar Heel. She has previously served as an editorial board member. Le is a sophomore pursuing a double major in media and journalism and information science, with a business minor.