The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Monday, May 13, 2024 Newsletters Latest print issue

We keep you informed.

Help us keep going. Donate Today.
The Daily Tar Heel

Year in Review: In one night, two crimes result in response review

Only one report proved true, but both brought scrutiny to Alert Carolina.

Year in Review: In one night, two crimes result in response review (Helen Woolard)
Quinn Matney, victim of a homophobic hate crime.

On the morning of April 4, two reported crimes would shake the community’s faith in Alert Carolina.

Only one would prove to be true.

Just after midnight, five students were robbed at gunpoint inside a suite in Morrison Residence Hall, police said.

And a freshman falsely reported that a man severely burned him on the wrist at 3 a.m. the same morning, calling him a homophobic slur in what the University suspected to be a hate crime.

Though only the armed robbery actually occurred, both revealed a schism in what information University officials release and what students believe they have a right to be notified about.

The University heard the concerns, and Chancellor Holden Thorp convened the Executive Group, a collection of 10 upper-level administrators, to review Alert Carolina policies.

The group is still reviewing those policies, but ideas for expanding the use of social media and sending an informational — rather than instructional — alert have arisen.

Some felt as though the siren and mass-text systems should have been activated, at least in the case of the armed robbery. UNC decided to notify the community through an informational post on the Alert Carolina website 12 hours after the incident occurred.

Officials did not notify campus of Quinn Matney’s reported attack until a week after the alleged incident, and the next day had to report that it was false.

Officials said they did not use Alert Carolina to notify campus through sirens and texting because there was no “immediate or imminent threat to campus.”

Outcry was loud and immediate. Officials defended the decision regarding the robbery because police could not confirm if the suspect who fled the scene had a gun and said the incident was isolated.

But Winston Crisp, vice chancellor for student affairs, said the University did not make the right decision by waiting to notify students about the alleged hate crime.

“We didn’t handle this the way it should have been handled,” Crisp said at an open forum April 14.

He said that incident should have been labeled at the second tier of campus safety protocols, which deals with ongoing issues, and not the third tier, which deals with resolved issues.

“We didn’t get that right,” he said.

Contact the University Editor at university@dailytarheel.com.

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.

Special Print Edition
The Daily Tar Heel's Collaborative Mental Health Edition