A group called People for Computational Freedom argued one vendor shouldn't have a monopoly on laptop sales. Others wanted the logistics of cost spelled out, ensuring that the requirement did not divide the campus into haves and have-nots.
Some said it was too much too soon.
And Hooker had answers for all of them. Perhaps the vice chancellor missed a column Hooker wrote in March 1998 when he outlined the purpose of the CCI and the importance of laptops for all students. "Universities everywhere are encouraging their faculties to become computer literate and to incorporate technology into the classroom," he wrote in Trusteeship Magazine. "Yet with half of any given class lacking the basic tools, we set ourselves up for failure."
I'd like someone to tell me how you incorporate technology into the classroom without making technology part of the classroom.
Hooker didn't live to see his vision through. And he's not here to fix the problems that higher-ups are ignoring.
Moore also has made no bones about the fact that she won't be assessing the program anytime soon.
Just a hunch, but if I were a head honcho, I'd be keeping an eye on a fledgling computer initiative at one of the largest public universities in the country. But that's just me.
Moore is treating the CCI like an irresponsible college dude with a cocker spaniel puppy. Sure it will help him pick up chicks, but if he leaves it alone without food or water, that mutt goes down for the dirt nap.
The time to evaluate this program is now. We need to know who's using these laptops in classes. Which professors are still looking for ways to incorporate the technology? Which profs don't know how to turn on a laptop? Who's doing it right, or wrong?
Moore and friends haven't carried out Hooker's vision, and they know it. That's why the definition of CCI conveniently changed last week. And their new definition is how Hooker described failure.
The impetus behind the CCI was about competition with peer universities, as UNC has a jones for keeping up with the Joneses. But deeper than that was the idea that students would graduate with cutting-edge skills in tow.
If students aren't using computers in classes, if the CCI is not about "taking laptops to class" then someone tell me why we rewired classrooms and made students pony up the dough.
To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.
And while I suspect that laptops make terrific plates or doorstops, I bet we could think up some better ways to put them to use.
Administrators need to return to Hooker's vision. Otherwise, I've got a better name for our computer plan.
Carolina Cheats Initiative.
Columnist Ashley Stephenson can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org. Those who reply using required laptops during class get a dollar.