The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Tuesday, May 14, 2024 Newsletters Latest print issue

We keep you informed.

Help us keep going. Donate Today.
The Daily Tar Heel

Naysayers Should Give CCI Chance

I write reluctantly, in that CCI resources have provided the College of Arts & Sciences with the funding for many of my department's positions (including my own). Consequently, my comments might easily be misconstrued as self-serving. Nevertheless, I am drawing on 10 years of experience managing information technology resources in higher education prior to coming to UNC when I state that CCI already has provided immediate, outstanding benefits to the faculty, staff and teaching graduate students in the Arts & Sciences. It provides current and ever-increasing benefits to students.

The CCI, among other things:

1.) provides high-quality computers for Arts and Sciences faculty, staff and teaching graduate instructors. No full-time faculty or staff member or teaching graduate instructor should have a computer right now that is more than 3 years old. Life cycling standard equipment on a three- to four-year cycle saves money in the long run by alleviating the support headache caused by a hodgepodge of 5- to 7-year-old computers from various vendors.

Institutionalizing the provision of computer technology has freed up departmental time and resources to focus on more important issues than year-to-year technology provision.

2.) provides funding in the Arts & Sciences to hire people to support this massive influx of capable technology and to support integrating information technology into the classroom. Seven CCI positions have been filled in the past year, and eight more will be hired in the next six to nine months to help support the increased use of technology.

3.) provides a cost-effective support environment that community members can count on when their computer equipment breaks. While perhaps unpopular with some Mac users, specifying a single vendor platform stretches thin support dollars and provides higher quality of service as a whole.

4.) provides instructors with a "known" student technology capability, allowing them to restructure courses without worrying that some students will not have access to the technology and information resources needed to complete certain assignments.

5.) provides need-based support for student purchase of laptops, eliminating questions of access for those unable to afford a computer.

I hope that any faculty, staff and students who still feel that the CCI has not lived up to its expectations will be patient, as the program is still unfolding. In order to make an institutional change of this size there are formidable challenges to address. For example, faculty and graduate instructors need access to and familiarity with the technology before they are in a position to decide whether integrating it into their particular subject area makes sense. This is a cumulative process that takes place over time through workshops, individual experimentation and reflection.

Also, although classrooms on campus continue to be renovated, many are presently ill-suited to accommodate the technology (wired or wireless) needed to support a complete class of "laptop-enhanced" students. With the recent passing of the higher education bonds, renovation efforts to enhance classroom technology will proceed more dramatically.

While the CCI is still in its early stages of implementation I welcome those with positive and negative experiences to share them in the spirit of moving forward. Shared positive experiences allow us to build on success, and shared negative experiences allow us to solve problems and focus on improving in the future. Already I'm aware that faculty in the English, psychology and mathematics departments have been asking first-year students (since it cannot be assumed yet that all sophomores, juniors and seniors have access to appropriate computer technology) to bring laptops for use in class, and have been having success in their efforts.

Is a goal of the CCI to have students using their laptop every day in every course? Of course not. Each faculty member or graduate instructor will need to decide for themselves the benefit (or detriment) of using these new technologies in support of learning.

Can the benefit of having life-cycled computer technology as an institutional priority be understated in an institution such as Carolina? Can the value of every incoming Carolina undergraduate from now on having 24-hour access to a portable computer be underestimated? I do not believe so in either case. This program has touched everyone in Arts & Sciences just in time, meeting a desperate need for updated computer equipment and support. As time goes on, I believe the CCI will be seen for what it is -- a program ahead of its time for a large public university, and one that provides a solid base from which the University community can experiment with innovative technologies that could enhance teaching, learning and research.

Rick Peterson is the director of Information Technology for the College of Arts & Sciences. Reach him at rick_peterson@unc.edu.

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.

Special Print Edition
The Daily Tar Heel's Collaborative Mental Health Edition