The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Saturday, April 27, 2024 Newsletters Latest print issue

We keep you informed.

Help us keep going. Donate Today.
The Daily Tar Heel

Courthouse Cameras Face Controversy

County officials might add closed-circuit cameras to courtrooms to hold trials without moving prisoners.

The new system, which places a camera, microphone and monitor in the two locations, allows the defendant, judge, defense attorney and district attorney to communicate in real time using a four-way split screen.

?I was leery when I first heard about this, because I always like to meet person-to-person to make sure the defendant understands everything that is going on,? Judge Pat DeVine said. ?But I was pleasantly surprised. I am actually able to spend more time with each defendant because they are less self-conscious and talk in a more relaxed and natural manner.?

The fact that defendants are put more at ease by this system concerns many defense attorneys, because the client is likely to disclose self-incriminating evidence.

Assistant Public Defender Thomas Fulghum argues that this system does an injustice to those on trial.

?There is an inherent danger in that defendants are more inclined to talk because they are not as impressed with the gravity of the courtroom and the whole situation in general,? he said. ?The defendant cannot see the room full of people watching the screen in the courtroom who could eventually become witnesses against anything the defendant might say.?

Another concern with the system is the inability for the defense attorney to speak confidentially to their client.

According to N.C. General Statute 15A-511, Subsection A-1, audio and video transmission between the judge and the defendant, in which the parties can see and hear each other, is lawful only if the defendant is allowed to communicate fully and confidentially with his attorney during the proceeding.

Thus far, a mechanism allowing a confidential discussion between attorney and client has not been installed.

?When an attorney brought this statute to my attention, I did not make a ruling on the bond request until the public defender went across the street to the jail and spoke with his client,? DeVine said.

Supporters of the video system cite safety and health concerns involved in the transport of defendants as a major incentive for the technology.

?There have been instances of people running once they get outside as well as angry and emotional victims who attempt to attack or harm the defendant,? DeVine said. ?Also, this eliminates the defendant having to go out in all kinds of weather wearing only flip flops and a short-sleeved orange jumpsuit.?

But Fulghum said he believes these safety concerns are unnecessary.

?The jail is only across one street. ... There is no danger of people being assaulted as they are surrounded by two or three bailiffs at any given time.?

Emily Canaday can be reached at sundancr1@msn.com.

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.

Special Print Edition
The Daily Tar Heel's Collaborative Mental Health Edition