Providing everyday opportunities for artistic viewing, these creatively functional diversions are just a few examples of public art. But what exactly constitutes public art varies.
Renee Piechocki, director of the Washington, D.C.-based Public Art Network, said the definition of public art should remain very wide. "Anytime you have an artist involved with a public project, you have public art," she said.
But what sets public art apart from other types of art is not just its public display but the potential for artists and their works to form interactive relationships with the people who will be viewing the works on a regular basis.
Public artist and UNC art Professor Juan Logan said public art should engage its viewing community by encouraging public discussion.
"It will hopefully engage them on some level, interacting with them on a daily basis without their having to do anything out of the ordinary," Logan said.
Kimowan McLain, an art instructor, serves on the Chapel Hill and University public arts commissions. He emphasized the importance that public art go beyond aesthetic appeal to become a poetic and diplomatic way to bring important issues to the forefront of public discussion and grapple with them.
"It's very difficult to have public art that is apolitical," McLain said. "If something is sitting there in a static, modernist position that isn't thought-provoking, that is beautiful to look at -- that, itself -- is a political statement."
"At its worst, public art could be neutral to the point of being boring," he said.
With such ideas in mind, UNC's Public Art Planning Committee is currently revising a proposal for a campus public art program. Art Professor Jim Hirschfield, who has created public art works all over the country, is serving on the committee and stresses the importance of art's everyday presence on campus.