Sometimes to foolish extents.
As part of this desire and the subsequent hunt, we cannot go up against them uneducated because that ship is destined to sink. So I feel that it is my job as a man to make a feeble attempt to figure females out or just explain some of the things they do.
You might have guessed by now that this is not the first time that I've come to this realization about women. Nor is it the first time such discussions have taken place in the vast confusion of the opposite sex. I'm sure if my friends and I had, on a number of occasions, a pen to go along with Top of the Hill napkins, we would have a collection of quips thorough enough for a 30-chapter book.
The book is on hold until I find a publisher who will best satisfy my interests ($$), and I cannot seem to get past the chapter on the "acquaintance to friend to girlfriend" transition. But I submit to you, as witnesses to relationships, good and bad, some of our experience-driven theories on women.
These are not theories derived by a club of He-Man Woman Haters but by confused college guys.
The first idea we were able to fully develop is that of the Theory of Who Can Care Less (Matt Saha Doctoral Thesis 2002).
Setting: Top of The Hill or some Ashley Forest party.
In order for a guy to get a girl's attention, he has to play it smooth. He stands across the room, giving an occasional look. The occasional look means that he has crossed the line to show interest, but he must be careful to not go far enough to show that he cares what the girl is doing. There is a fine line between caring and interest, which makes it difficult to understand and maneuver.
Playing this game is derived from fear of denial or being put up in the open, but that's a deeper subject.