The UNC General Alumni Association and the curriculum in peace, war and defense sponsored the forum, titled "Should the United States Attack Iraq?" A panel of eight UNC professors voiced opinions from different perspectives, but the general sentiment was against a war on Iraq.
History Professor Richard Kohn served as the moderator.
"The panelists had varying perspectives and disciplines," Kohn said after the forum. "Overall, they expressed deep skepticism of whether it is in the national interest of the United States to engage in a pre-emptive war against Iraq without congressional and (United Nations) sanction."
Kohn also remarked on the imminence of war with Iraq as the United States tries to build support at the United Nations and in Congress for possible military action. "We are coming to a decision (on Iraq) in the next 10 days to two weeks," Kohn said. "Under any circumstance, this is a historic decision."
The panelists presented different perspectives, ranging from the legality of war to the implications in the Muslim world.
Focusing on a moral and ethical perspective, philosophy Professor Douglas MacLean said there should be convincing evidence before the nation engages in war. "In the justification of a pre-emptive strike, the threshold must be high and the evidence must be strong," he said. "Many people doubt this has been met."
History Professor Sarah Shields, who received applause for several of her comments, focused on the implications for Iraq.
"Will the U.S. become a welcome liberator? Absolutely not," Shields said. "Anti-American sentiment will grow because people are skeptical."
Doug Dibbert, president of the GAA, organized the discussion forum.