Experts say Easley's action has major implications.
"This is the first time the veto power has been used since the royal governors, if they even used it," said UNC political science Professor Thad Beyle.
By using that power, Easley is "saying that he might use the veto in the future," Beyle said.
"This could be something that he has done to send to the (N.C.) General Assembly a message that he is going to be tougher to work with."
The bill Easley chose to take a stand on was a minor appointments bill, vetoed because some of the appointees were deceased, others could not be appointed legally and additional appointments had expired.
Beyle said the governor's veto of such a minor bill simply could be a ploy to get the General Assembly back in Raleigh before January.
To override the veto, legislators would have to call a special session before they reconvene next year, an action Beyle said might not sit well with lawmakers.
Rep. Joe Hackney, D-Orange, said the vetoed bill was of little importance and that many legislators would be upset if forced to reconvene.
"They would prefer not to come back," he said.