The Committee on Student Conduct discussed Tuesday some recommended changes to the student Honor Court, including the appeals process.
Committee members spoke generally about amendments to both the Honor Court's appeals process and its academic sanctions.
One recommended change calls for the submission of a detailed statement by the defendant outlining the grounds for appeal.
The statement would have to be the accused student's own work -- the student's legal counsel would not be permitted to write it.
Committee members also talked about reducing the time limit for filing a detailed statement from 10 days after the initial ruling to five business days.
Appeals based on newly discovered evidence also were discussed. The group considered the possibility of removing the grounds of newly discovered evidence from the appeals process and instead making it a separate process without a time limitation.
Members also discussed the idea of offering a wider menu of sanctions to be handed down by the Honor Court.
New sanctions would be implemented to reinforce the educational aspects of the Honor Code and teach students in violation of the code about their offenses.