The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Monday, April 29, 2024 Newsletters Latest print issue

We keep you informed.

Help us keep going. Donate Today.
The Daily Tar Heel

Despite Freeze, UNC Wary of Tuition Hike

The UNC-system Board of Governors' decision Friday to pass a one-year moratorium on tuition increases leaves campus officials, who approved a tuition hike proposal in December, waiting on word from the state legislature.

Meanwhile, UNC-Chapel Hill's tuition proposal remains in limbo.

Despite a unanimous recommendation from the BOG to freeze rising tuition costs for a year after increases in each of the past three years, UNC-CH officials think the N.C. General Assembly might decide to pass a systemwide tuition hike anyway.

Chancellor James Moeser said Monday there is no guarantee the legislature will either overrule or support the BOG decision.

A proposal from the UNC-CH Tuition Task Force called for a three-year, $1,050 tuition increase to combat disparities in faculty, staff and teaching assistant salaries and to grant additional financial aid. It was designed to raise about $24 million.

But if the legislature decides to increase tuition systemwide to alleviate the state's budget crisis, both the amount and uses for the increase could change significantly. Traditionally, systemwide increases have been used to offset inflation or to fund broad needs rather than for faculty salaries or other campus-specific needs.

Moeser said that UNC-CH's proposal is a good three-year plan and that he is concerned the BOG's decision will affect the plan to raise salaries for campus employees and financial aid money. "It definitely hurts the campus," he said.

Student Body President Jen Daum had a mixed response to the BOG decision itself. "I'm pleased that the BOG is taking action after many years of (tuition) hikes," she said. Daum added that if the legislature were to pass tuition increases and not allow campuses to do it at their own discretion, financial aid money for students might not be included.

Forty percent of the money that would have been generated by the task force's proposal would go to financial aid for students.

Shirley Ort, director of scholarships and student aid at UNC-CH and a member of the task force, said that there would have been no revenue lost under the task force proposal for financial aid but that a raise from the state legislature could exclude money for student aid.

Moeser said lobbying for funding priorities might be necessary in the event of a tuition increase from the state legislature.

State Sen.-elect Richard Stevens, R-Wake, a former member of the UNC-CH Board of Trustees, served on the Tuition Task Force. Stevens said the BOG decision was a wise one considering the economic climate in the state.

"It seems to me like it was a timely decision," Stevens said. "Tuition is a two-way street. People have to pay it."

Provost Robert Shelton, who also co-chaired the task force, said that in the meantime, the group's proposal will be sent to the BOT next week for informational purposes only.

Shelton said the task force's recommendations could be used as an effective starting point if a similar group has to revisit the issue a year from now.

He said, "I hope the work that the task force did will not be discredited."

The University Editor can be reached at udesk@unc.edu.

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.

Special Print Edition
The Daily Tar Heel's Collaborative Mental Health Edition