UNC's School of Law will join organizations from across the nation -- including the White House -- in taking a stance on a case that could determine the role of race in college admissions.
The law school plans to file an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court case regarding affirmative action policies at the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, arguing that achieving a diverse student body is a compelling interest for a public law school.
"We believe it is crucial to have a strongly integrated student body," said Gene Nichol, law school dean. "We think it is crucial to the education process."
Some undergraduate and graduate applicants to UM have contested that the school's affirmative action admissions policies violate their constitutional rights by racially discriminating against them.
Last week, President Bush voiced his opposition to the admissions system at UM, calling it "divisive, unfair and impossible to square with the Constitution."
But the UNC law school's argument would support the position taken by UM in the first affirmative action case the Supreme Court has heard since 1978.
This case is one of the most important cases affecting public education in the last 25 years, said Jack Boger, the law school professor drafting the brief.
"Public universities and public law schools have a special mission to educate the future generations of their state," he said. "This case is indispensible for our future."
Nichol said he expects that a number of other universities also will file amicus briefs in support of UM. Amicus briefs are filed by outside parties that support either the plaintiff or the defendant. They advise the court about where other interested parties stand on the issue.