The Tuition Advisory Task Force's recommendations made up a small step of a lengthy process, but the group missed a major opportunity to send trustees a message that exploitative increases are unwanted.
The task force presented three recommendations to the UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees, calling for an in-state tuition hike of $250 to $350 and an out-of-state tuition increase of $800 to $1200.
That's simply too much. In a year following major campus-based increases, we need a tuition freeze.
The task force was assembled this year with a very narrow focus - to research increases within the trustees' pre-stated philosophy. The group included two consistently involved members of the BOT for the first time since campus-based tuition increases began.
It's important to note that the task force is not a body representative of student interests - in purpose or in composition.
The committee consists of the student body president, two other BOT members, three other students, five faculty members and three administrators.
Student body vice president Alexa Kleysteuber noted in a letter to The Daily Tar Heel in October that the committee is "bound by the BOT's tuition philosophy to raise in-state tuition to no higher than the 25th percentile of our peer institutions and out-of-state tuition to no higher than the 75th percentile."
In student government's October Report, an analysis of progress made by student officers since the beginning of their term in April, officials noted that the committee had worked to "set suggested priorities for the uses of a potential tuition increase. These priorities include need-based financial aid, faculty salaries and decreases in class size, among others."
It's unfortunate that the tuition task force has been relegated to a less prominent role. It's not voicing recommendations that advocate for students or faculty - it's simply taking care of the details to justify the trustees' spending student money.