Academic freedom at the University came under fire during 2004, with two separate incidents highlighting UNC’s struggle to preserve classroom rights without stepping on others’ toes.
On Oct. 22, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights released a report stating that the University responded properly to a situation in which an English lecturer sent a discriminatory e-mail that chastised a student for making anti-homosexual comments during class.
“We want to recognize the University for realizing that the lecturer’s e-mail message was an inappropriate response to the student’s comments,” the report states.
The decision marked an end to several months of deliberation and discussions of academic freedom that began when UNC English lecturer Elyse Crystall sent the e-mail to her class Feb. 6.
“We are pleased that the Office for Civil Rights’ review found that the University acted appropriately in this case,” Chancellor James Moeser stated in a release.
During the analysis process, OCR officials first investigated whether Crystall’s actions constituted an actual incident of racial or sexual discrimination.
According to a letter sent to Moeser on Wednesday, the civil rights office determined that the language in the e-mail “went beyond a permissible reference ... (of) describing the student and targeted him for criticism based in part on the student’s race and sex.”
Though OCR officials found evidence of intentional discrimination and harassment in Crystall’s actions, the group determined that no further action is required by the University to uphold constitutional protections.
Although OCR officials determined that the University was in compliance with the law, their review stressed the negative implications of intentional discrimination and harassment.