The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Wednesday, May 8, 2024 Newsletters Latest print issue

We keep you informed.

Help us keep going. Donate Today.
The Daily Tar Heel

Proposal sees 2nd rejection in 2 days

$150 fee increase to go before BOT

With the clock ticking on the eve of the Board of Trustees meeting, the Chancellor’s Committee on Student Fees became the second body in as many days to reject a dramatic student fee increase.

The committee held an almost two-hour emergency meeting Tuesday to discuss a plan that would increase both merit-based scholarships and funding for the Department of Athletics.

Much of the committee’s debate hinged on the role of student fees, which several members, particularly students, defined as dues paid in exchange for services.

Judith Wegner, chairwoman of the faculty, had called for logo revenues to be shifted from athletics to merit-based scholarships during Monday’s Student Fee Audit Committee meeting.

The shift called for a $150 athletics fee to be tacked onto student fees to replace funding for athletics, increasing both athletics funding and merit scholarships through a single fee hike.

For Tuesday’s meeting, Wegner whittled her proposal down to a $50 hike per student in a move that she said she hoped would garner a more receptive response.

Wegner addressed concerns about the late nature of the proposal in her opening statement to the committee, of which she is a member.

“I know this seems like, ‘Why now and why this year?’” she said. “I wouldn’t have brought this idea ahead if there wasn’t a real pressing need.”

Though student fee discussions typically are held in the early fall, Wegner said her brainstorming didn’t bear fruit until recently.

She outlined her rationale, noting the importance of attracting top-flight students as well as maintaining the prestige and exposure athletics provides the University.

Director of Athletics Dick Baddour, also a committee member, supported Wegner’s claims with evidence that the athletics department operates on a tighter budget than do those of competing institutions.

Although committee members all recognized that the athletics department requires significantly more funding that it receives, they ultimately decided that merit-based scholarships and athletic funding should be examined as separate issues.

Margaret Jablonski, vice chancellor for student affairs and a committee member, said more research should be done to find the best solutions to what she agreed are pressing issues.

“This might be one solution, but we don’t know what the other solutions might be,” she said.

The committee also decided to recommend more discussion about increasing the fee for the 2006-07 school year. Leaders are in the process of putting their recommendations down on paper.

Although Wegner’s plan didn’t receive the support of either committee, she still plans to present it to the trustees’ University Affairs Committee today.

“I don’t have any presumption about their taking action,” she said. “I really want to at least put the concepts out on the table.”

Contact the University Editor at udesk@unc.edu.

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.

Special Print Edition
The Daily Tar Heel's Collaborative Mental Health Edition