RALEIGH — The Senate committee reviewing the N.C. legislature’s lottery bill met for the first time Wednesday to examine the proposal passed by the House earlier this month.
On the docket were questions about ambiguous language in the bill and the possibility that it could expand video poker’s reach in the state.
Rep. Bill Owens, D-Pasquotank, stressed in his introduction of the bill that a moral opposition to gambling should not stop senators from voting in favor of a lottery and bringing in an estimated $300 million a year — revenue now lost, at least in part, to lotteries in neighboring states.
“Educating kids in other states is worse than gambling,” Owens said.
The bill finally passed the House after longtime Speaker Jim Black, a Mecklenburg County Democrat, agreed to support it. It would give 50 percent of lottery revenue to prizes, 34 percent to education and 16 percent to administrative costs.
On Wednesday, senators’ questions about the bill reflected issues that are likely to become contentious.
Vague language in the bill would put surplus administrative funds toward undefined “public purposes.” Senators might revise the proposal to ensure that the extra money goes to fund education.
Administrative costs for comparable state lotteries run at an average of 5 percent to 6 percent of revenue, lawmakers were told, so another 10 percent of lottery cash potentially could go to education.
In addition, language in the bill that would allow the use of machines to play lottery games concerned several senators because of past attempts to outlaw video poker.