Most people agree that homelessness is a bad thing, but exactly how it should be eliminated is less cut and dry.
Last week government officials, social workers and concerned residents met in a round-table discussion to talk about a 10-year plan to end homelessness that was approved by the municipalities in 2004.
How that academic exchange of ideas will relay into tangible action remains to be seen - as does how the new initiative will tie in with pre-existing community efforts.
Philip Mangano, executive director for the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness, the keynote speaker at last week's round-table, emphasized that including the entire community, from police to businesses to government officials, is key to bringing the plan to fruition.
But while municipal officials and social workers have by and large come on board with the plan, uncertainty and concern still exist in the community, especially as concrete details for the new project still are being worked out.
"Unless it's done pragmatically, I think the application could be more philosophical than real," said Chris Moran, executive director of the Inter-Faith Council.
The IFC is an alliance of groups including church congregations that traditionally has provided Chapel Hill with shelter services.
Moran also expressed concern about a new theory for combatting homelessness, Housing First, that Mangano pushed at the forum.
Housing First, a new policy from the Bush administration, proposes that it's better to put chronically homeless individuals into homes and then attempt to give them services than to follow the Clinton administration's Continuum of Care - which calls for a gradual transition from emergency shelters to self-sufficiency.