The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Saturday, May 11, 2024 Newsletters Latest print issue

We keep you informed.

Help us keep going. Donate Today.
The Daily Tar Heel

Elections board ready to start again

The 2005-06 school year was a turbulent time for the campus Board of Elections.

The group, which is in charge of making sure campus elections run smoothly and fairly, faced criticism from student leaders concerning its impartiality. It also had equally staunch defenders who said many naysayers had an axe to grind.

Now, as newly appointed board Chairman Jim Brewer starts his work, he's hoping to quell the storm - and he's got a variety of tricks up his sleeve to make that happen.

Among the changes he has promised is a new online voting system meant to alleviate the problems many students had last year, leading to disputes about whether election results should have been certified.

Other promised reforms include:

  •  operating at least 10 polling sites in future general elections;
  •  creating a catalog of the board's decisions and a guide to running elections, both of which also will be available to the public;
  •  hosting a convention for campus elections officials from other North Carolina universities to share knowledge and expertise;
  •  improving publicity for campus elections, including the operation of a 962-VOTE hot line to answer voters' questions;
  •  creating a committee to review Title VI of the Student Code, the document that outlines policies for student government. Title VI deals with campus elections.

Brewer said his work would build on the work the board did last year.

"I don't consider anything this year to be a mistake," he said, adding that he would give last year's board an A-minus rating.

Some campus leaders aren't so sure about the high grade - complaints include the nullification of many elections at different times and accusations of mishandling a round of special elections.

The latter case ultimately led to the convening of the Student Supreme Court, an organization that settles disputes having to do with the Student Code. The DTH was among the complainants.

"You don't have to be a specialist to understand that there were some massive screwups all over the place," said Student Congress Rep. Pablo Friedmann.

"It wasn't just one isolated case. It was rampant, and it was sustained."

Friedmann, along with other Congress members, has raised concerns that the board might have acted to influence the outcome of elections. He also was vocal when the board fined Bernard Holloway, the candidate Friedmann backed for student body president, for a campaign violation.

"It just seemed like one big mess," Congress Speaker Pro Tem Dustin Ingalls said of the mix-ups.

But Ingalls doesn't believe the board acted with malicious intent.

"I wouldn't say if the (board) continues to do the job they did in the past year I'd be satisfied, but I think everything they did was well intentioned," he said.

Contact the University Editor at udesk@unc.edu.

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.

Special Print Edition
The Daily Tar Heel's Collaborative Mental Health Edition