It would be incredibly fortunate for Andrew Phillips if the case against him, and his dismal interpretation of the Student Code, is dismissed tonight.
But it shouldn’t happen. The suit needs to go forward, and plaintiff Deanna Santoro has the standing for it to do so.
Almost everyone wants this election to be over. And it would be great to know the results. But more important for the integrity of the Code and for student government would be genuine resolution to the Board of Elections’ mishandling.
Tonight’s hearing is to weigh Phillips’ argument that Santoro lacks the proper authorization in the Code to bring a suit against him.
Phillips is getting it wrong.
While the relevant sections regarding ability to sue are more nuanced than the sections he is alleged of violating, his motion to dismiss is just as inexcusably wrong as the decisions he is being sued over.
He writes that Santoro doesn’t meet the criteria for being adversely affected by the BOE’s failure to force Ian Lee to resign from his executive position before running for president.
His motion states that her injury from resigning as speaker, which Santoro had to do in order to sue, stemmed from her “willful action.” Not from the shoddy work by the BOE that drove her decision.
He also states that the complaint was not filed within the 96-hour window to challenge a BOE decision.