In the days following the dismissal of head football Coach Butch Davis, University administrators decided to prioritize the reform of the honor system as a way to repair UNC in the wake of the NCAA investigation.
“Regardless of the situation with football, it just makes good sense to seek ways to improve our commitment to honor and integrity,” Chancellor Holden Thorp wrote in an email to UNC students and faculty in early August.
The task of honor reform fell to Chairwoman of the Faculty Jan Boxill, who embarked on a handful of initiatives, the most serious of which have focused on improving faculty participation in the system.
These included the creation of a faculty advisory committee and the discussed implementation of an online plagiarism detection software.
Faculty disengagement in the honor system has been at the center of the reform.
At an October meeting of the Faculty Council, several faculty members offered sharp criticism of the system.
“The fully student-run Honor Court is doing a poor job of enhancing intellectual honesty on campus,” said sociology professor Andrew Perrin at the meeting.
Perrin added that he knew of department chairmen who specifically discourage professors in their departments to report cases to the Honor Court.
The focus on the honor system began after it was revealed that former defensive end Michael McAdoo had plagiarized a paper, and that offense was not detected by the honor system.